Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs HD Graphics 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 3000 HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4400 HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 5500
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2000 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 2000
2011
0.55

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 1787% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1220441
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT1Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores484
Core clock speed850 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate8.100no data
Floating-point processing power0.1296 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1no data
TMUs6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12_2
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−127%
25
+127%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−117%
13
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−83.3%
11
+83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−733%
50
+733%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−117%
13
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−243%
24
+243%
Fortnite 0−1 60−65
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−550%
39
+550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−900%
80−85
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−520%
30−35
+520%
World of Tanks 16−18
−825%
140−150
+825%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−400%
30
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−900%
80−85
+900%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1533%
45−50
+1533%
World of Tanks 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Valorant 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 9−10
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Dota 2 14−16
−1767%
280−290
+1767%
Valorant 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 2000 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 127% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in World of Tanks, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 7300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is ahead in 24 tests (43%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (57%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.55 10.38
Recency 1 February 2011 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 1787.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
vs
HD 8250 Radeon HD 8250
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
vs
GT 240M GeForce GT 240M
GT 330M Mac Edition GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition
vs
9600M GT Mac Edition GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition
GTX 1070 Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
vs
Pro 5300 Radeon Pro 5300
HD Graphics 6000 HD Graphics 6000
vs
Arc A580 Arc A580
GTX 1070 Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
vs
RX 460 Radeon RX 460
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
A30X A30X
RTX 2060 TU104 RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 2060 TU104
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
S7150 x2 FirePro S7150 x2
GTX 980 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
vs
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
ATI X1900 G5 Mac Edition Radeon X1900 G5 Mac Edition
vs
ATI 9800 XT Radeon 9800 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7 1355 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 10 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.