Radeon PRO W7700 vs H3C XG310
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 40 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 82.64 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 21.76 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025) |
| GPU code name | DG1 | Navi 32 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2020 (4 years ago) | 13 November 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 ×4 | 3072 |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 28,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 190 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 ×4 | 499.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.69 TFLOPS ×4 | 31.95 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 ×4 | 96 |
| TMUs | 48 ×4 | 192 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 241 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB ×4 | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit ×4 | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s ×4 | 576.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 November 2020 | 13 November 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 190 Watt |
PRO W7700 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 57.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between H3C XG310 and Radeon PRO W7700. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
