RTX PRO 6000 vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) with RTX PRO 6000, including specs and performance data.
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms RTX PRO 6000 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 499 | 615 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.84 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG (2023−2025) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) |
| GPU code name | Meteor Lake iGPU | GB202 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (2 years ago) | 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4 | 24064 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 2017 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1950 MHz | 2407 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 92,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 600 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 1,810 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 115.8 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 176 |
| TMUs | no data | 752 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 752 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 188 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 23.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 128 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 304 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 96 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 1.79 TB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort 2.1b |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.4 |
| CUDA | - | 10.1 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 25
+56.3%
| 16−18
−56.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 13
+62.5%
|
8−9
−62.5%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 18−20
+58.3%
|
12−14
−58.3%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+59.3%
|
27−30
−59.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 11
+57.1%
|
7−8
−57.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+47.6%
|
21−24
−47.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50
+66.7%
|
30−33
−66.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−33
+66.7%
|
18−20
−66.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+45.8%
|
24−27
−45.8%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+55%
|
60−65
−55%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+59.3%
|
27−30
−59.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 13
+62.5%
|
8−9
−62.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
+66.7%
|
12−14
−66.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24
+50%
|
16−18
−50%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+65.7%
|
35−40
−65.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 39
+62.5%
|
24−27
−62.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−33
+66.7%
|
18−20
−66.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 15
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+58.3%
|
12−14
−58.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+45.8%
|
24−27
−45.8%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 22
+57.1%
|
14−16
−57.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+56.3%
|
16−18
−56.3%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+55%
|
60−65
−55%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+59.3%
|
27−30
−59.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+48.6%
|
35−40
−48.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
+66.7%
|
12−14
−66.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+47.6%
|
21−24
−47.6%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+65.7%
|
35−40
−65.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30
+66.7%
|
18−20
−66.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−33
+66.7%
|
18−20
−66.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+45.8%
|
24−27
−45.8%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 18−20
+58.3%
|
12−14
−58.3%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+55%
|
60−65
−55%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+48%
|
50−55
−48%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+62.5%
|
8−9
−62.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+57.1%
|
7−8
−57.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+66.7%
|
30−33
−66.7%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+50%
|
16−18
−50%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+50%
|
12−14
−50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+66.7%
|
12−14
−66.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+64.3%
|
14−16
−64.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+55.6%
|
9−10
−55.6%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+52.9%
|
70−75
−52.9%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+66.7%
|
12−14
−66.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
+57.1%
|
7−8
−57.1%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+50%
|
8−9
−50%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+60%
|
10−11
−60%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+45.7%
|
35−40
−45.7%
|
This is how Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and RTX PRO 6000 compete in popular games:
- Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 56% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.57 | 6.57 |
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 46% higher aggregate performance score.
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 6000 in performance tests.
Be aware that Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
