Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs RTX PRO 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO 2000 Blackwell PRO 4000 Blackwell PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF PRO 4500 Blackwell PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell PRO 5000 Blackwell PRO 6000 PRO 6000 Blackwell PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 6000 with Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 6000
2025
96 GB GDDR7, 600 Watt
98.84
+964%

RTX PRO 6000 outperforms Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) by a whopping 964% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX PRO 6000 RTX PRO 6000
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3496
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.76no data
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGB202Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2025 (recently)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240644
Core clock speed2017 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2407 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors92,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1,810no data
Floating-point processing power115.8 TFLOPSno data
ROPs176no data
TMUs752no data
Tensor Cores752no data
Ray Tracing Cores188no data
L1 Cache23.5 MB768 KB
L2 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16no data
Length304 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7no data
Maximum RAM amount96 GBno data
Memory bus width512 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth1.79 TB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1bno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.4-
CUDA10.1-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD230−240
+945%
22
−945%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+0%
30
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how RTX PRO 6000 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 is 945% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 50 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 98.84 9.29

RTX PRO 6000 has a 963.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The RTX PRO 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX PRO 6000 RTX PRO 6000
vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
RTX PRO 6000 RTX PRO 6000
vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
RX 6550S RX 6550S
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
RX 6450M RX 6450M
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB
RTX PRO 6000 RTX PRO 6000
vs
Arc Graphics 32EU Arc Graphics 32EU
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
vs
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RX 8040S RX 8040S
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
vs
PRO W9070 PRO W9070
Radeon 860M 860M
vs
8400 GS 8400 GS

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.4 61 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 6000 or Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.