P102-100 vs GeForce4 MX 420

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated524
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.19
Power efficiencyno data2.13
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNV17 A3GP102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 February 2002 (22 years ago)12 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3200
Core clock speed250 MHz1582 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1683 MHz
Number of transistors29 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000336.6
Floating-point processing powerno data10.77 TFLOPS
ROPs280
TMUs4200

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount64 MB5 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1376 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/s440.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 MX 420 4
P102-100 2945
+73525%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2002 12 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 5 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 16 nm

P102-100 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 7900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 MX 420 and P102-100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 MX 420 is a desktop card while P102-100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420
GeForce4 MX 420
NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 23 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 31 vote

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.