GMA 3150 vs GeForce2 Go 100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameNV11 B2Pineview
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 February 2001 (23 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed125 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors20 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate0.50.8
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs21
TMUs42

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width32 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed166 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.09.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.22.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2001 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 180 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 13 Watt

GeForce2 Go 100 has 550% lower power consumption.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 Go 100 and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 Go 100 is a notebook card while GMA 3150 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 100
GeForce2 Go 100
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate GeForce2 Go 100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 140 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.