GMA 3150 vs GeForce4 420 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15831600
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameNV17 A5Pineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 February 2002 (23 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores216
Core clock speed200 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed190 MHzno data
Number of transistors29 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rate0.80.8
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs21
TMUs42

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.09.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 420 Go 3
+50%
Samples: 8
GMA 3150 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 no data

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 0−1 no data

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2002 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 150 nm 45 nm

GMA 3150 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 420 Go and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 420 Go
GeForce4 420 Go
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate GeForce4 420 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 174 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 420 Go or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.