Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce RTX 5060

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 5060 with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5060
2025
8 GB GDDR7, 145 Watt
20.35

PRO V710 outperforms RTX 5060 by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking288176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation31.08no data
Power efficiency9.9314.73
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGB206Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date19 May 20253 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38403456
Core clock speed2280 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed2497 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors21,900 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate299.6432.0
Floating-point processing power19.18 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs120216
Tensor Cores120no data
Ray Tracing Cores3054

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB28 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s504.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1bNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.41.3
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5060 20.35
PRO V710 32.88
+61.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5060 8125
PRO V710 13129
+61.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−59.3%
180−190
+59.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−59.3%
180−190
+59.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−51.5%
100−105
+51.5%
Fortnite 100−110
−53.8%
160−170
+53.8%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−50%
120−130
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−58.7%
100−105
+58.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−60%
120−130
+60%
Valorant 140−150
−57.5%
230−240
+57.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−59.3%
180−190
+59.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
−48.9%
350−400
+48.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−51.5%
100−105
+51.5%
Fortnite 100−110
−53.8%
160−170
+53.8%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−50%
120−130
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−58.7%
100−105
+58.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−60%
120−130
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−60.7%
90−95
+60.7%
Valorant 140−150
−57.5%
230−240
+57.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−51.5%
100−105
+51.5%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−50%
120−130
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−60%
120−130
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−60.7%
90−95
+60.7%
Valorant 140−150
−57.5%
230−240
+57.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−53.8%
160−170
+53.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−60.8%
230−240
+60.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−57%
270−280
+57%
Valorant 180−190
−57.6%
290−300
+57.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−60.7%
90−95
+60.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−55.6%
70−75
+55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−60%
80−85
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−52.2%
70−75
+52.2%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%
Valorant 110−120
−59.3%
180−190
+59.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−50%
45−50
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.35 32.88
Recency 19 May 2025 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 28 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 158 Watt

RTX 5060 has an age advantage of 7 months, and 9% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has a 61.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 250% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon PRO V710 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 5060 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
GeForce RTX 5060
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 589 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 5060 or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.