Radeon PRO W6300 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Place in the ranking	56	363
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	30.57	39.91
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	AD106	Navi 24
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)	19 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	768
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	1512 MHz
Boost clock speed	1695 MHz	2040 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	244.1	97.92
Floating-point processing power	15.62 TFLOPS	3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	32
TMUs	144	48
Tensor Cores	144	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	36	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x4
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	32 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4070 Mobile 50.95
+252%

PRO W6300 14.46

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4070 Mobile 19590
+252%

PRO W6300 5559

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	128 +266%	35−40 −266%
1440p	74 +252%	21−24 −252%
4K	47 +292%	12−14 −292%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	127 +263%	35−40 −263%
Cyberpunk 2077	133 +280%	35−40 −280%
Elden Ring	147 +268%	40−45 −268%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +287%	30−33 −287%
Counter-Strike 2	111 +270%	30−33 −270%
Cyberpunk 2077	58 +263%	16−18 −263%
Forza Horizon 4	285 +256%	80−85 −256%
Metro Exodus	140 +300%	35−40 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +296%	24−27 −296%
Valorant	210−220 +257%	60−65 −257%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +287%	30−33 −287%
Counter-Strike 2	94 +292%	24−27 −292%
Cyberpunk 2077	49 +308%	12−14 −308%
Dota 2	156 +290%	40−45 −290%
Elden Ring	227 +278%	60−65 −278%
Far Cry 5	103 +281%	27−30 −281%
Fortnite	200−210 +275%	55−60 −275%
Forza Horizon 4	233 +258%	65−70 −258%
Grand Theft Auto V	145 +263%	40−45 −263%
Metro Exodus	111 +270%	30−33 −270%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +257%	60−65 −257%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +296%	24−27 −296%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +287%	45−50 −287%
Valorant	210−220 +257%	60−65 −257%
World of Tanks	270−280 +272%	75−80 −272%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +287%	30−33 −287%
Counter-Strike 2	83 +295%	21−24 −295%
Cyberpunk 2077	44 +267%	12−14 −267%
Dota 2	167 +271%	45−50 −271%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +263%	30−33 −263%
Forza Horizon 4	203 +269%	55−60 −269%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +257%	60−65 −257%
Valorant	210−220 +257%	60−65 −257%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	90 +275%	24−27 −275%
Elden Ring	125 +257%	35−40 −257%
Grand Theft Auto V	89 +271%	24−27 −271%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +289%	45−50 −289%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +293%	14−16 −293%
World of Tanks	300−350 +261%	90−95 −261%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +300%	21−24 −300%
Counter-Strike 2	51 +264%	14−16 −264%
Cyberpunk 2077	27 +286%	7−8 −286%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +295%	40−45 −295%
Forza Horizon 4	134 +283%	35−40 −283%
Metro Exodus	105 +289%	27−30 −289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	88 +267%	24−27 −267%
Valorant	180−190 +264%	50−55 −264%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30 +275%	8−9 −275%
Dota 2	90 +275%	24−27 −275%
Elden Ring	64 +256%	18−20 −256%
Grand Theft Auto V	89 +271%	24−27 −271%
Metro Exodus	44 +267%	12−14 −267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +287%	45−50 −287%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +260%	10−11 −260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	89 +271%	24−27 −271%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +294%	16−18 −294%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +256%	16−18 −256%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 +300%	3−4 −300%
Dota 2	146 +265%	40−45 −265%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +254%	24−27 −254%
Fortnite	80−85 +290%	21−24 −290%
Forza Horizon 4	72 +300%	18−20 −300%
Valorant	100−105 +270%	27−30 −270%

This is how RTX 4070 Mobile and PRO W6300 compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Mobile is 266% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Mobile is 252% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Mobile is 292% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	50.95	14.46
Recency	3 January 2023	19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	4 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	25 Watt

RTX 4070 Mobile has a 252.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

PRO W6300, on the other hand, has 360% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W6300 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.