GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q vs Radeon PRO W6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking412not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.78no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 24AD103
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date19 January 2022 (3 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7689728
Core clock speed1512 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed2040 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate97.92442.3
Floating-point processing power3.133 TFLOPS28.31 TFLOPS
ROPs32112
TMUs48304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Cores1276
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KB9.5 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB64 MB
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width32 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 January 2022 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 80 Watt

PRO W6300 has 220% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W6300 and GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W6300 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 167 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W6300 or GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.