GeForce GTX 285 X2 vs RTX 4050 Mobile
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 105 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 74 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | GN21-X2 | GT200B |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 17 June 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 648 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2370 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP) | 315 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 140.4 | 51.84 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and GeForce GTX 285 X2 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 275 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 16000 GB/s | 2.3 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 147.5 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
| HDMI | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| CUDA | 8.9 | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 17 June 2009 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 315 Watt |
We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and GeForce GTX 285 X2. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 285 X2 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
