Jetson Nano vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking122not rated
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Power efficiency52.17no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameAD107GM20B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560128
Core clock speed1455 MHz640 MHz
Boost clock speed1755 MHz921 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate140.414.74
Floating-point processing power8.986 TFLOPS0.2358 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8016
Tensor Cores80no data
Ray Tracing Cores20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x4

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 GB/s1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1
CUDA8.95.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 10 Watt

RTX 4050 Mobile has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson Nano, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and Jetson Nano. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIA Jetson Nano
Jetson Nano

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2575 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Jetson Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.