Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and Arc Graphics 130V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4050 Mobile
2023
6 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
37.51
+221%

RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms Arc Graphics 130V by a whopping 221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking123411
Place by popularity42not in top-100
Power efficiency51.76no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Xe² (2025)
GPU code nameAD107Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25607
Core clock speed1455 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1755 MHz1850 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate140.4no data
Floating-point processing power8.986 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data
Tensor Cores80no data
Ray Tracing Cores20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width96 Bitno data
Memory clock speed16000 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4050 Mobile 37.51
+221%
Arc Graphics 130V 11.70

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4050 Mobile 14423
+221%
Arc Graphics 130V 4499

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4050 Mobile 30465
+220%
Arc Graphics 130V 9523

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4050 Mobile 22400
+171%
Arc Graphics 130V 8255

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 4050 Mobile 8331
+157%
Arc Graphics 130V 3242

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95
+197%
32
−197%
1440p47
+236%
14−16
−236%
4K31
+244%
9−10
−244%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 79
+92.7%
41
−92.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 103
+243%
30−33
−243%
Elden Ring 117
+244%
30−35
−244%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+168%
35−40
−168%
Counter-Strike 2 67
+116%
31
−116%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+242%
12−14
−242%
Forza Horizon 4 204
+187%
71
−187%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+184%
30−35
−184%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+147%
30−33
−147%
Valorant 185
+311%
45−50
−311%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+168%
35−40
−168%
Counter-Strike 2 59
+111%
28
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+260%
10−11
−260%
Dota 2 140
+241%
41
−241%
Elden Ring 128
+276%
30−35
−276%
Far Cry 5 97
+246%
28
−246%
Fortnite 160−170
+148%
65−70
−148%
Forza Horizon 4 168
+190%
58
−190%
Grand Theft Auto V 126
+200%
40−45
−200%
Metro Exodus 32
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+124%
85−90
−124%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+147%
30−33
−147%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+277%
35−40
−277%
Valorant 150−160
+233%
45−50
−233%
World of Tanks 270−280
+72.2%
160−170
−72.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+168%
35−40
−168%
Counter-Strike 2 43
+72%
25
−72%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+230%
10−11
−230%
Dota 2 162
+224%
50−55
−224%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+107%
45−50
−107%
Forza Horizon 4 145
+202%
48
−202%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+124%
85−90
−124%
Valorant 138
+207%
45−50
−207%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 58
+287%
14−16
−287%
Elden Ring 56
+229%
16−18
−229%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+263%
16−18
−263%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+250%
50−55
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+270%
10−11
−270%
World of Tanks 230−240
+187%
80−85
−187%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+204%
21−24
−204%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+127%
10−12
−127%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+260%
5−6
−260%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+365%
24−27
−365%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+211%
27−30
−211%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+242%
24−27
−242%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+321%
14−16
−321%
Valorant 92
+217%
27−30
−217%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Dota 2 64
+191%
21−24
−191%
Elden Ring 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+191%
21−24
−191%
Metro Exodus 45
+543%
7−8
−543%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+253%
30−35
−253%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+191%
21−24
−191%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+291%
10−12
−291%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+533%
6−7
−533%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+350%
2−3
−350%
Dota 2 115
+229%
35−40
−229%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+293%
14−16
−293%
Fortnite 50−55
+300%
12−14
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 53
+253%
14−16
−253%
Valorant 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%

This is how RTX 4050 Mobile and Arc Graphics 130V compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 197% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 236% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 244% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4050 Mobile is 543% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4050 Mobile is ahead in 53 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.51 11.70
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm

RTX 4050 Mobile has a 220.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 130V, on the other hand, has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 130V in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 2895 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.