GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs RTX 3080

Place in performance ranking	27	503
Place by popularity	89	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	49.14	1.61
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Ampere GA102	GF110
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	16 September 2020 (3 years ago)	29 November 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3080 has 2952% better value for money than GTX 560 Ti 448.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8704	448
Core clock speed	1450 MHz	732 MHz
Boost clock speed	1710 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	28,300 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	320 Watt	210 Watt
Texture fill rate	465.1	40.99
Floating-point performance	29.77 gflops	1.312 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	285 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	10 GB	1280 MB
Memory bus width	320 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	19000 MHz	3800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	760.3 GB/s	152.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2	N/A
CUDA	8.5	2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3080 65.42
+698%

GTX 560 Ti 448 8.20

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3080 39257
+832%

GTX 560 Ti 448 4210

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	164 +811%	18−21 −811%
1440p	121 +764%	14−16 −764%
4K	82 +720%	10−12 −720%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

120−130

+800%

14−16
−800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +744%	16−18 −744%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	111 +825%	12−14 −825%
Battlefield 5	200−210 +771%	24−27 −771%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +729%	14−16 −729%
Cyberpunk 2077	138 +763%	16−18 −763%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +721%	14−16 −721%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +783%	18−20 −783%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +763%	27−30 −763%
Hitman 3	116 +729%	14−16 −729%
Horizon Zero Dawn	240−250 +707%	30−33 −707%
Metro Exodus	144 +700%	18−20 −700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	131 +719%	16−18 −719%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	270−280 +803%	30−33 −803%
Watch Dogs: Legion	248 +727%	30−33 −727%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +744%	16−18 −744%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	96 +700%	12−14 −700%
Battlefield 5	200−210 +771%	24−27 −771%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +729%	14−16 −729%
Cyberpunk 2077	134 +738%	16−18 −738%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +721%	14−16 −721%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +783%	18−20 −783%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +763%	27−30 −763%
Hitman 3	118 +743%	14−16 −743%
Horizon Zero Dawn	240−250 +707%	30−33 −707%
Metro Exodus	144 +700%	18−20 −700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +757%	14−16 −757%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	326 +715%	40−45 −715%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 +769%	16−18 −769%
Watch Dogs: Legion	238 +781%	27−30 −781%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +744%	16−18 −744%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	88 +780%	10−11 −780%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +729%	14−16 −729%
Cyberpunk 2077	131 +719%	16−18 −719%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +721%	14−16 −721%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +763%	27−30 −763%
Hitman 3	110 +817%	12−14 −817%
Horizon Zero Dawn	182 +767%	21−24 −767%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	287 +720%	35−40 −720%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	149 +728%	18−20 −728%
Watch Dogs: Legion	101 +742%	12−14 −742%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

131

+719%

16−18
−719%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	150−160 +739%	18−20 −739%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−110 +758%	12−14 −758%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +744%	9−10 −744%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	76 +744%	9−10 −744%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +756%	9−10 −756%
Cyberpunk 2077	86 +760%	10−11 −760%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +756%	9−10 −756%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +803%	30−33 −803%
Hitman 3	112 +700%	14−16 −700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	151 +739%	18−20 −739%
Metro Exodus	107 +792%	12−14 −792%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	219 +711%	27−30 −711%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +729%	14−16 −729%
Watch Dogs: Legion	247 +723%	30−33 −723%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

130

+713%

16−18
−713%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +778%	9−10 −778%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +713%	8−9 −713%
Hitman 3	57 +714%	7−8 −714%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +730%	27−30 −730%
Metro Exodus	142 +788%	16−18 −788%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	115 +721%	14−16 −721%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +783%	6−7 −783%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	52 +767%	6−7 −767%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +700%	6−7 −700%
Cyberpunk 2077	43 +760%	5−6 −760%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +820%	5−6 −820%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +800%	12−14 −800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	135 +744%	16−18 −744%
Watch Dogs: Legion	54 +800%	6−7 −800%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95
+850%

10−11

−850%

This is how RTX 3080 and GTX 560 Ti 448 compete in popular games:

RTX 3080 is 811% faster in 1080p
RTX 3080 is 764% faster in 1440p
RTX 3080 is 720% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	65.42	8.20
Recency	16 September 2020	29 November 2011
Maximum RAM amount	10 GB	1280 MB
Chip lithography	8 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	320 Watt	210 Watt

RTX 3080 has a 697.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 560 Ti 448, on the other hand, has 52.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3080 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.