GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs RTX 3080 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile with GeForce GTX 460 OEM, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3080 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
36.73
+1324%

RTX 3080 Mobile outperforms GTX 460 OEM by a whopping 1324% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking100795
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.341.36
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGA104GF104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 January 2021 (4 years ago)11 October 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6144336
Core clock speed1110 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors17,400 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate296.636.40
Floating-point processing power18.98 TFLOPS0.8736 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs19256
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz850 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s108.8 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.62.1
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD119
+1388%
8−9
−1388%
1440p74
+1380%
5−6
−1380%
4K45
+1400%
3−4
−1400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 179
+1392%
12−14
−1392%
Counter-Strike 2 212
+1414%
14−16
−1414%
Cyberpunk 2077 121
+1413%
8−9
−1413%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 140
+1456%
9−10
−1456%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+1389%
9−10
−1389%
Counter-Strike 2 205
+1364%
14−16
−1364%
Cyberpunk 2077 96
+1500%
6−7
−1500%
Far Cry 5 129
+1333%
9−10
−1333%
Fortnite 170−180
+1325%
12−14
−1325%
Forza Horizon 4 194
+1517%
12−14
−1517%
Forza Horizon 5 148
+1380%
10−11
−1380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+1450%
10−11
−1450%
Valorant 220−230
+1331%
16−18
−1331%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 85
+1600%
5−6
−1600%
Battlefield 5 140
+1456%
9−10
−1456%
Counter-Strike 2 156
+1460%
10−11
−1460%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+1444%
18−20
−1444%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+1580%
5−6
−1580%
Dota 2 134
+1389%
9−10
−1389%
Far Cry 5 122
+1425%
8−9
−1425%
Fortnite 170−180
+1325%
12−14
−1325%
Forza Horizon 4 188
+1467%
12−14
−1467%
Forza Horizon 5 135
+1400%
9−10
−1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 131
+1356%
9−10
−1356%
Metro Exodus 100
+1329%
7−8
−1329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+1450%
10−11
−1450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 191
+1492%
12−14
−1492%
Valorant 220−230
+1331%
16−18
−1331%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 134
+1389%
9−10
−1389%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
+1420%
5−6
−1420%
Dota 2 128
+1500%
8−9
−1500%
Far Cry 5 114
+1325%
8−9
−1325%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+1470%
10−11
−1470%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+1450%
10−11
−1450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 106
+1414%
7−8
−1414%
Valorant 179
+1392%
12−14
−1392%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
+1325%
12−14
−1325%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 101
+1343%
7−8
−1343%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+1411%
18−20
−1411%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+1467%
6−7
−1467%
Metro Exodus 58
+1350%
4−5
−1350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1358%
12−14
−1358%
Valorant 260−270
+1344%
18−20
−1344%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 108
+1443%
7−8
−1443%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+1500%
3−4
−1500%
Far Cry 5 103
+1371%
7−8
−1371%
Forza Horizon 4 130
+1344%
9−10
−1344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+1480%
5−6
−1480%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+1400%
7−8
−1400%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
Counter-Strike 2 31
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
Grand Theft Auto V 93
+1450%
6−7
−1450%
Metro Exodus 37
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70
+1650%
4−5
−1650%
Valorant 240−250
+1400%
16−18
−1400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 67
+1575%
4−5
−1575%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+1467%
3−4
−1467%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Dota 2 110
+1471%
7−8
−1471%
Far Cry 5 55
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Forza Horizon 4 87
+1350%
6−7
−1350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+1700%
3−4
−1700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+1633%
3−4
−1633%

This is how RTX 3080 Mobile and GTX 460 OEM compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Mobile is 1388% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 Mobile is 1380% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 Mobile is 1400% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.73 2.58
Recency 12 January 2021 11 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 150 Watt

RTX 3080 Mobile has a 1323.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 400% more advanced lithography process, and 30.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 460 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 815 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 17 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile or GeForce GTX 460 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.