Radeon R7 350 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile with Radeon R7 350, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3070 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
32.49
+571%

3070 Mobile outperforms R7 350 by a whopping 571% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking165660
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.777.09
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGA104Cape Verde
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 January 2021 (4 years ago)6 July 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120512
Core clock speed1110 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors17,400 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate249.625.60
Floating-point processing power15.97 TFLOPS0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs8016
TMUs16032
Tensor Cores160no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L1 Cache5 MB128 KB
L2 Cache4 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD112
+600%
16−18
−600%
1440p70
+600%
10−12
−600%
4K45
+650%
6−7
−650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 241
+589%
35−40
−589%
Cyberpunk 2077 119
+644%
16−18
−644%
Hogwarts Legacy 97
+593%
14−16
−593%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+589%
18−20
−589%
Counter-Strike 2 230
+667%
30−33
−667%
Cyberpunk 2077 107
+664%
14−16
−664%
Far Cry 5 119
+644%
16−18
−644%
Fortnite 150−160
+633%
21−24
−633%
Forza Horizon 4 189
+600%
27−30
−600%
Forza Horizon 5 144
+586%
21−24
−586%
Hogwarts Legacy 88
+633%
12−14
−633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+672%
18−20
−672%
Valorant 210−220
+600%
30−33
−600%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 134
+644%
18−20
−644%
Counter-Strike 2 172
+617%
24−27
−617%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+595%
40−45
−595%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+633%
12−14
−633%
Dota 2 130
+622%
18−20
−622%
Far Cry 5 114
+613%
16−18
−613%
Fortnite 150−160
+633%
21−24
−633%
Forza Horizon 4 188
+596%
27−30
−596%
Forza Horizon 5 132
+633%
18−20
−633%
Grand Theft Auto V 125
+594%
18−20
−594%
Hogwarts Legacy 72
+620%
10−11
−620%
Metro Exodus 97
+593%
14−16
−593%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+672%
18−20
−672%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170
+608%
24−27
−608%
Valorant 210−220
+600%
30−33
−600%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 126
+600%
18−20
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+640%
10−11
−640%
Dota 2 120
+650%
16−18
−650%
Far Cry 5 107
+664%
14−16
−664%
Forza Horizon 4 167
+596%
24−27
−596%
Hogwarts Legacy 59
+638%
8−9
−638%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+672%
18−20
−672%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 94
+571%
14−16
−571%
Valorant 183
+578%
27−30
−578%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+633%
21−24
−633%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 106
+657%
14−16
−657%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+591%
35−40
−591%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+592%
12−14
−592%
Metro Exodus 59
+638%
8−9
−638%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+629%
24−27
−629%
Valorant 254
+626%
35−40
−626%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 102
+629%
14−16
−629%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+571%
7−8
−571%
Far Cry 5 91
+658%
12−14
−658%
Forza Horizon 4 140
+678%
18−20
−678%
Hogwarts Legacy 47
+571%
7−8
−571%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+600%
9−10
−600%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+650%
12−14
−650%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 32
+700%
4−5
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+592%
12−14
−592%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Metro Exodus 37
+640%
5−6
−640%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+611%
9−10
−611%
Valorant 238
+580%
35−40
−580%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 63
+600%
9−10
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+680%
5−6
−680%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+633%
3−4
−633%
Dota 2 109
+581%
16−18
−581%
Far Cry 5 51
+629%
7−8
−629%
Forza Horizon 4 93
+675%
12−14
−675%
Hogwarts Legacy 27
+575%
4−5
−575%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+633%
6−7
−633%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+617%
6−7
−617%

This is how RTX 3070 Mobile and R7 350 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 600% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 600% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 650% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.49 4.84
Recency 12 January 2021 6 July 2016
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 55 Watt

RTX 3070 Mobile has a 571.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

R7 350, on the other hand, has 127.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 350 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2139 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 546 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile or Radeon R7 350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.