Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) vs Quadro T600 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T600 Mobile with Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), including specs and performance data.

T600 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 40 Watt
15.87
+105%

T600 Mobile outperforms 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking353544
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Power efficiency31.9841.70
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTU117Vega
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (4 years ago)7 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896512
Core clock speed780 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1410 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate78.96no data
Floating-point processing power2.527 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs56no data
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T600 Mobile 15.87
+105%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 7.76

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T600 Mobile 10498
+78.8%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 5873

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T600 Mobile 39112
+83.6%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 21299

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T600 Mobile 7928
+112%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 3734

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T600 Mobile 53941
+99.7%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 27008

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T600 Mobile 2766
+138%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 1163

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
+132%
22
−132%
1440p30−35
+87.5%
16
−87.5%
4K18−21
+80%
10
−80%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+77.8%
18
−77.8%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+84.6%
39
−84.6%
Far Cry 5 53
+152%
21
−152%
Fortnite 90−95
+97.9%
47
−97.9%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+89.2%
35−40
−89.2%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+63.6%
33
−63.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+129%
14
−129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%
Valorant 130−140
+59.5%
80−85
−59.5%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+118%
33
−118%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+350%
48
−350%
Dota 2 116
+127%
51
−127%
Far Cry 5 49
+145%
20
−145%
Fortnite 90−95
+200%
31
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+89.2%
35−40
−89.2%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+92.9%
28
−92.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 63
+250%
18
−250%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+220%
10
−220%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+125%
16
−125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+148%
21
−148%
Valorant 130−140
+59.5%
80−85
−59.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+140%
30
−140%
Dota 2 107
+123%
48
−123%
Far Cry 5 45
+137%
19
−137%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+89.2%
35−40
−89.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+113%
14−16
−113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+100%
14
−100%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+417%
18
−417%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+495%
21
−495%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+222%
9
−222%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+120%
10
−120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Valorant 160−170
+78.5%
90−95
−78.5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+129%
21
−129%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+138%
16
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+110%
20−22
−110%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+129%
16−18
−129%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+210%
10
−210%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+117%
6
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Valorant 95−100
+123%
40−45
−123%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Dota 2 60−65
+233%
18
−233%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+138%
8
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Counter-Strike 2 43
+0%
43
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike 2 19
+0%
19
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%
Valorant 37
+0%
37
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
+0%
22
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how T600 Mobile and RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) compete in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is 132% faster in 1080p
  • T600 Mobile is 88% faster in 1440p
  • T600 Mobile is 80% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the T600 Mobile is 495% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile performs better in 50 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.87 7.76
Recency 12 April 2021 7 January 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

T600 Mobile has a 104.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), on the other hand, has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T600 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 37 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1581 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T600 Mobile or Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.