GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs Radeon R7 350

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 350 with GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R7 350
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
5.12

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms R7 350 by a whopping 721% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking670101
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.1528.08
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCape VerdeGA104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 July 2016 (9 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5125632
Core clock speed800 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate25.60248.2
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPS15.88 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs32176
Tensor Coresno data176
Ray Tracing Coresno data44
L1 Cache128 KB5.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−743%
118
+743%
1440p8−9
−800%
72
+800%
4K5−6
−860%
48
+860%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 129
+0%
129
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 89
+0%
89
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 111
+0%
111
+0%
Far Cry 5 138
+0%
138
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 133
+0%
133
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 79
+0%
79
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 89
+0%
89
+0%
Dota 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Far Cry 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70
+0%
70
+0%
Metro Exodus 95
+0%
95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 188
+0%
188
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+0%
81
+0%
Dota 2 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 122
+0%
122
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 193
+0%
193
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 53
+0%
53
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 43
+0%
43
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95
+0%
95
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how R7 350 and RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 743% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 800% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 860% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.12 42.05
Recency 6 July 2016 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 115 Watt

R7 350 has 109.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 721.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 350 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 563 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1054 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 350 or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.