RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 with RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3060
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 170 Watt
44.43

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX 3060 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8241
Place by popularity4not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.36no data
Power efficiency18.0326.85
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA106no data
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date12 January 2021 (4 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35847424
Core clock speed1320 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1777 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate199.0no data
Floating-point processing power12.74 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs112no data
Tensor Cores112no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1875 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 44.43
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 58.37
+31.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 17085
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 22444
+31.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3060 28375
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 54921
+93.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3060 21379
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 40179
+87.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD122
−31.1%
160−170
+31.1%
1440p72
−25%
90−95
+25%
4K50
−30%
65−70
+30%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.70no data
1440p4.57no data
4K6.58no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
−25%
120−130
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−26.6%
100−105
+26.6%
Elden Ring 119
−26.1%
150−160
+26.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
−26.1%
140−150
+26.1%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
−25%
120−130
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
−29.9%
100−105
+29.9%
Forza Horizon 4 226
−28.3%
290−300
+28.3%
Metro Exodus 120
−25%
150−160
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
−29.4%
110−120
+29.4%
Valorant 180−190
−27.1%
230−240
+27.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
−26.1%
140−150
+26.1%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
−25%
120−130
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 72
−25%
90−95
+25%
Dota 2 146
−30.1%
190−200
+30.1%
Elden Ring 149
−27.5%
190−200
+27.5%
Far Cry 5 105
−23.8%
130−140
+23.8%
Fortnite 180−190
−28.3%
240−250
+28.3%
Forza Horizon 4 180
−27.8%
230−240
+27.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
−27.7%
180−190
+27.7%
Metro Exodus 87
−26.4%
110−120
+26.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
−29.2%
270−280
+29.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
−29.4%
110−120
+29.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
−29.6%
210−220
+29.6%
Valorant 180−190
−27.1%
230−240
+27.1%
World of Tanks 270−280
−25.4%
350−400
+25.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
−26.1%
140−150
+26.1%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
−25%
120−130
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
−25%
75−80
+25%
Dota 2 147
−29.3%
190−200
+29.3%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−26.2%
130−140
+26.2%
Forza Horizon 4 154
−29.9%
200−210
+29.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
−29.2%
270−280
+29.2%
Valorant 180−190
−27.1%
230−240
+27.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 81
−23.5%
100−105
+23.5%
Elden Ring 85
−29.4%
110−120
+29.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
−23.5%
100−105
+23.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−25.7%
220−230
+25.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−30.4%
60−65
+30.4%
World of Tanks 280−290
−24.6%
350−400
+24.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−28.2%
100−105
+28.2%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−27.7%
60−65
+27.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
−21.6%
45−50
+21.6%
Far Cry 5 140−150
−25.9%
180−190
+25.9%
Forza Horizon 4 115
−30.4%
150−160
+30.4%
Metro Exodus 89
−23.6%
110−120
+23.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
−23.5%
100−105
+23.5%
Valorant 140−150
−28.4%
190−200
+28.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−25%
60−65
+25%
Dota 2 82
−22%
100−105
+22%
Elden Ring 44
−25%
55−60
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 82
−22%
100−105
+22%
Metro Exodus 32
−25%
40−45
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−29.3%
190−200
+29.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 82
−22%
100−105
+22%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−22.6%
65−70
+22.6%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−25%
60−65
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Dota 2 115
−30.4%
150−160
+30.4%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−30.4%
90−95
+30.4%
Fortnite 65−70
−28.8%
85−90
+28.8%
Forza Horizon 4 67
−26.9%
85−90
+26.9%
Valorant 75−80
−26.6%
100−105
+26.6%

This is how RTX 3060 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 31% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 25% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 30% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.43 58.37
Recency 12 January 2021 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 150 Watt

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 31.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3060 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 is a desktop card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 29515 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 22 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.