Radeon RX 7800 XT vs GeForce Go 7600 GT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7600 GT with Radeon RX 7800 XT, including specs and performance data.

Go 7600 GT
2006
256 MB GDDR3
0.54

RX 7800 XT outperforms Go 7600 GT by a whopping 11594% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking122030
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data68.04
Power efficiencyno data16.46
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG73Navi 32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 August 2006 (18 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores173840
Core clock speed500 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz2430 MHz
Number of transistors177 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data263 Watt
Texture fill rate6.000583.2
Floating-point processing powerno data37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs12240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7600 GT 0.54
RX 7800 XT 63.15
+11594%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7600 GT 210
RX 7800 XT 24336
+11489%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−21500%
216
+21500%
1440p1−2
−12100%
122
+12100%
4K0−170

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.31
1440pno data4.09
4Kno data7.13

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8500%
258
+8500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−4350%
178
+4350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3700%
110−120
+3700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6333%
193
+6333%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−15000%
150−160
+15000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2380%
120−130
+2380%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−2230%
230−240
+2230%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4167%
250−260
+4167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−400%
150−160
+400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−6425%
261
+6425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3700%
110−120
+3700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5267%
161
+5267%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−15000%
150−160
+15000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2380%
120−130
+2380%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−2230%
230−240
+2230%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−6533%
398
+6533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1220%
130−140
+1220%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−400%
150−160
+400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3150%
130
+3150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3700%
110−120
+3700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4833%
148
+4833%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2380%
120−130
+2380%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−2640%
274
+2640%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−5567%
340
+5567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1900%
200
+1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−383%
145
+383%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−9700%
95−100
+9700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 119
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9600%
97
+9600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7200%
70−75
+7200%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−7133%
217
+7133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−23400%
230−240
+23400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3400%
100−110
+3400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−8800%
89
+8800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 72

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3100%
60−65
+3100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 222
+0%
222
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 181
+0%
181
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 158
+0%
158
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 222
+0%
222
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 124
+0%
124
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 148
+0%
148
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 243
+0%
243
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
+0%
147
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Hitman 3 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+0%
118
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 164
+0%
164
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
+0%
130
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 67
+0%
67
+0%

This is how Go 7600 GT and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 21500% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 12100% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 23400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is ahead in 35 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 63.15
Recency 1 August 2006 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm

RX 7800 XT has a 11594.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7600 GT is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 GT
GeForce Go 7600 GT
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2942 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.