GeForce MX570 vs RTX 3060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 with GeForce MX570, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3060
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 170 Watt
44.28
+198%

RTX 3060 outperforms MX570 by a whopping 198% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81353
Place by popularity4not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation71.36no data
Power efficiency18.1041.32
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA106GA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842048
Core clock speed1320 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed1777 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate199.073.92
Floating-point processing power12.74 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs4840
TMUs11264
Tensor Cores11264
Ray Tracing Cores2816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1875 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 44.28
+198%
GeForce MX570 14.86

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 17085
+198%
GeForce MX570 5735

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD124
+210%
40−45
−210%
1440p81
+200%
27−30
−200%
4K52
+225%
16−18
−225%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.65no data
1440p4.06no data
4K6.33no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 79
+243%
21−24
−243%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+174%
30−35
−174%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 102
+325%
24−27
−325%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+196%
45−50
−196%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+197%
30−33
−197%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+239%
21−24
−239%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+166%
35−40
−166%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+163%
40−45
−163%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+111%
95−100
−111%
Hitman 3 120
+329%
27−30
−329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+136%
75−80
−136%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+172%
50−55
−172%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+141%
40−45
−141%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
+246%
45−50
−246%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+73.1%
75−80
−73.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+174%
30−35
−174%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85
+254%
24−27
−254%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+196%
45−50
−196%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+197%
30−33
−197%
Cyberpunk 2077 75
+226%
21−24
−226%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+166%
35−40
−166%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+163%
40−45
−163%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+111%
95−100
−111%
Hitman 3 116
+314%
27−30
−314%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+136%
75−80
−136%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+172%
50−55
−172%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+141%
40−45
−141%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180
+275%
45−50
−275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+160%
35−40
−160%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+73.1%
75−80
−73.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+174%
30−35
−174%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75
+213%
24−27
−213%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+197%
30−33
−197%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+178%
21−24
−178%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+166%
35−40
−166%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+111%
95−100
−111%
Hitman 3 101
+261%
27−30
−261%
Horizon Zero Dawn 142
+86.8%
75−80
−86.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 154
+221%
45−50
−221%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+109%
35−40
−109%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
−32.2%
75−80
+32.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+141%
40−45
−141%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+200%
27−30
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+196%
21−24
−196%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+227%
14−16
−227%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+400%
12−14
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+225%
16−18
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+388%
8−9
−388%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+200%
16−18
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+213%
75−80
−213%
Hitman 3 68
+278%
18−20
−278%
Horizon Zero Dawn 106
+253%
30−33
−253%
Metro Exodus 89
+242%
24−27
−242%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 115
+326%
27−30
−326%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+319%
16−18
−319%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+125%
90−95
−125%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+217%
24−27
−217%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+221%
14−16
−221%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+245%
10−12
−245%
Hitman 3 45
+309%
10−12
−309%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+164%
70−75
−164%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+321%
14−16
−321%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+350%
14−16
−350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+244%
9−10
−244%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
+443%
7−8
−443%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+800%
2−3
−800%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+215%
20−22
−215%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67
+379%
14−16
−379%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27
+350%
6−7
−350%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+208%
12−14
−208%

This is how RTX 3060 and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 is 210% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 is 200% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 is 225% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3060 is 800% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 32% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.28 14.86
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 25 Watt

RTX 3060 has a 198% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has 580% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 is a desktop card while GeForce MX570 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 28163 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 92 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.