Radeon RX 6900 XT vs GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Place in the ranking	166	21
Place by popularity	90	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	29.87
Power efficiency	28.26	16.09
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GA106	Navi 21
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	12 January 2021 (3 years ago)	28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	5120
Core clock speed	900 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz	2250 MHz
Number of transistors	13,250 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	171.0	720.0
Floating-point processing power	10.94 TFLOPS	23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	128
TMUs	120	320
Tensor Cores	120	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	30	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 Mobile 32.53

RX 6900 XT 69.44
+113%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 Mobile 12550

RX 6900 XT 26791
+113%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3060 Mobile 27419

RX 6900 XT 59119
+116%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3060 Mobile 20609

RX 6900 XT 50587
+145%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	98 −99%	195 +99%
1440p	66 −89.4%	125 +89.4%
4K	42 −88.1%	79 +88.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	5.12
1440p	no data	7.99
4K	no data	12.65

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

103

−31.1%

130−140
+31.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 −67.1%	117 +67.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	76 −122%	169 +122%
Battlefield 5	100−110 −109%	220−230 +109%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −80.3%	110−120 +80.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	86 −57%	130−140 +57%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −60.3%	110−120 +60.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −107%	170−180 +107%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −37.6%	230−240 +37.6%
Hitman 3	106 −21.7%	120−130 +21.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 −78.2%	250−260 +78.2%
Metro Exodus	164 +5.8%	150−160 −5.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −52.5%	120−130 +52.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 −155%	290−300 +155%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 −28.8%	150−160 +28.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 −299%	279 +299%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	64 −122%	142 +122%
Battlefield 5	100−110 −109%	220−230 +109%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −80.3%	110−120 +80.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	69 −95.7%	130−140 +95.7%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −60.3%	110−120 +60.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −107%	170−180 +107%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −37.6%	230−240 +37.6%
Hitman 3	108 −19.4%	120−130 +19.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	189 −33.9%	250−260 +33.9%
Metro Exodus	129 −20.2%	150−160 +20.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	102 −19.6%	120−130 +19.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	158 −85.4%	290−300 +85.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 −119%	140−150 +119%
Watch Dogs: Legion	158 +3.9%	150−160 −3.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 −40%	98 +40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	56 −145%	137 +145%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −80.3%	110−120 +80.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	62 −118%	130−140 +118%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −60.3%	110−120 +60.3%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −43.4%	248 +43.4%
Hitman 3	96 −34.4%	120−130 +34.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120 −136%	283 +136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140 −109%	290−300 +109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	78 −110%	164 +110%
Watch Dogs: Legion	46 −163%	121 +163%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−27.1%

120−130
+27.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −166%	160−170 +166%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −122%	110−120 +122%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −183%	99 +183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	48 −127%	109 +127%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −113%	80−85 +113%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 −89.7%	70−75 +89.7%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −116%	80−85 +116%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −44.9%	270−280 +44.9%
Hitman 3	64 −57.8%	100−110 +57.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85 −164%	224 +164%
Metro Exodus	85 −37.6%	117 +37.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	101 −95%	190−200 +95%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −186%	120−130 +186%
Watch Dogs: Legion	116 −106%	230−240 +106%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−42.5%

110−120
+42.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −172%	85−90 +172%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −165%	65−70 +165%
Hitman 3	41 −102%	83 +102%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 −41.3%	220−230 +41.3%
Metro Exodus	60 −83.3%	110−120 +83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55 −122%	122 +122%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −224%	68 +224%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	11 −500%	66 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 −155%	50−55 +155%
Cyberpunk 2077	15 −133%	35−40 +133%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −260%	162 +260%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60 −83.3%	110−120 +83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	19 −184%	54 +184%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−70.5%

75−80
+70.5%

This is how RTX 3060 Mobile and RX 6900 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6900 XT is 99% faster in 1080p
RX 6900 XT is 89% faster in 1440p
RX 6900 XT is 88% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3060 Mobile is 6% faster.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6900 XT is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3060 Mobile is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
RX 6900 XT is ahead in 70 tests (97%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	32.53	69.44
Recency	12 January 2021	28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	300 Watt

RTX 3060 Mobile has an age advantage of 2 months, and 275% lower power consumption.

RX 6900 XT, on the other hand, has a 113.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6900 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.