UHD Graphics 750 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Place in performance ranking	44	624
Place by popularity	18	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	44.60	2.10
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code name	Ampere GA104	Rocket Lake GT1
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	1 December 2020 (3 years ago)	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data
Current price	$361 (0.9x MSRP)	$1454

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3060 Ti has 2024% better value for money than UHD Graphics 750.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4864	256
Core clock speed	1410 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1665 MHz	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	17,400 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)	220 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	253.1	20.80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and UHD Graphics 750 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	Ring Bus
Length	242 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
CUDA	8.6	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 Ti 53.17
+1084%

UHD Graphics 750 4.49

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 1084% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3060 Ti 20536
+1085%

UHD Graphics 750 1733

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 1085% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	138 +1280%	10−12 −1280%
1440p	81 +1250%	6−7 −1250%
4K	51 +1175%	4−5 −1175%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

950−1000
+1045%

−1045%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +1082%	10−12 −1082%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +1000%	10−11 −1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	950−1000 +1073%	81 −1073%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +1067%	12−14 −1067%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +1043%	21−24 −1043%
Hitman 3	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Horizon Zero Dawn	280−290 +1067%	24−27 −1067%
Metro Exodus	80−85 +1043%	7−8 −1043%
Red Dead Redemption 2	140−150 +1067%	12−14 −1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180−190 +1025%	16−18 −1025%
Watch Dogs: Legion	240−250 +1043%	21−24 −1043%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +1082%	10−12 −1082%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +1000%	10−11 −1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	900−950 +1054%	78 −1054%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +1067%	12−14 −1067%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +1043%	21−24 −1043%
Hitman 3	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Horizon Zero Dawn	280−290 +1067%	24−27 −1067%
Metro Exodus	80−85 +1043%	7−8 −1043%
Red Dead Redemption 2	140−150 +1067%	12−14 −1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180−190 +1025%	16−18 −1025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +1000%	10−11 −1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	240−250 +1043%	21−24 −1043%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +1000%	10−11 −1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	900−950 +1069%	77 −1069%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +1043%	21−24 −1043%
Horizon Zero Dawn	280−290 +1067%	24−27 −1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180−190 +1025%	16−18 −1025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +1000%	10−11 −1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	240−250 +1043%	21−24 −1043%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

140−150
+1067%

12−14

−1067%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +1025%	8−9 −1025%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 +1067%	6−7 −1067%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	700−750 +1067%	60 −1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +1067%	6−7 −1067%
Cyberpunk 2077	600−650 +1054%	52 −1054%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +1043%	7−8 −1043%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +1043%	7−8 −1043%
Hitman 3	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +1000%	10−11 −1000%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1600−1650 +1051%	139 −1051%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95
+1025%

8−9

−1025%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Hitman 3	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Cyberpunk 2077	290−300 +1060%	25 −1060%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +1067%	6−7 −1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%