Arc A770M vs GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 3050 4 GB RTX 3050 6 GB RTX 3050 8 GB RTX 3050 8 GB GA107
VS
Arc A370M Arc A530M Arc A730M Arc A770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB with Arc A770M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 8 GB
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
31.56
+5.9%

RTX 3050 8 GB outperforms Arc A770M by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RTX 3050 8 GB RTX 3050 8 GB
Arc A770M Arc A770M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking168184
Place by popularity11not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation67.85no data
Power efficiency17.3717.77
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA106DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604096
Core clock speed1552 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speed1777 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate142.2524.8
Floating-point processing power9.098 TFLOPS16.79 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs80256
Tensor Cores80512
Ray Tracing Cores2032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 8 GB 31.56
+5.9%
Arc A770M 29.80

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3050 8 GB 12612
+5.9%
Arc A770M 11908

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
+1.1%
94
−1.1%
1440p60−65
+5.3%
57
−5.3%
4K40−45
+2.6%
39
−2.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.62no data
1440p4.15no data
4K6.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
+0%
113
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 256
+0%
256
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 100
+0%
100
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Dota 2 58
+0%
58
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 211
+0%
211
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+0%
86
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+0%
33
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 179
+0%
179
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
World of Tanks 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+0%
74
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how RTX 3050 8 GB and Arc A770M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 8 GB is 1% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 8 GB is 5% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 8 GB is 3% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.56 29.80
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 120 Watt

RTX 3050 8 GB has a 5.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc A770M, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 8.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB and Arc A770M.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is a desktop card while Arc A770M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 3050 8 GB GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
vs
GTX 1660 Super GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Arc A770M Arc A770M
vs
RTX 2060 Mobile GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
RTX 3050 8 GB GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
vs
RX 5600 OEM Radeon RX 5600 OEM
RTX 3050 8 GB Arc 5 A550M
vs
Arc 5 A550M GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
RTX 3050 8 GB Arc 7 A770M
vs
Arc 7 A770M GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
RTX 3050 8 GB Arc 7 A780
vs
Arc 7 A780 GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
RTX 3050 8 GB Arc A370M
vs
Arc A370M GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
RTX 3050 8 GB Arc A550M
vs
Arc A550M GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
RTX 3050 8 GB Arc A730M
vs
Arc A730M GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
RTX 3050 8 GB 7700 XT
vs
RX 7700 XT RTX 3050 8 GB
RTX 3050 8 GB 6500
vs
RX 6500 RTX 3050 8 GB
RTX 3050 8 GB Arc A780
vs
Arc A780 GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
RTX 3050 8 GB RTX 3050 OEM
vs
RTX 3050 OEM RTX 3050 8 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 13377 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 91 vote

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.