ATI Mobility Radeon vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Mobility Radeon, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms Mobility by a whopping 1783% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 288 | 1105 |
| Place by popularity | 56 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 28.52 | no data |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2025) | Rage 6 (2000−2007) |
| GPU code name | GN20-P0 | M6 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 11 May 2021 (5 years ago) | 1 December 2001 (24 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1238 MHz | 144 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 30 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP) | no data |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 0.43 |
| ROPs | no data | 1 |
| TMUs | no data | 3 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | no data | AGP 4x |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 144 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 2.304 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | no data | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 59
+1867%
| 3−4
−1867%
|
| 1440p | 43
+2050%
| 2−3
−2050%
|
| 4K | 27
+2600%
| 1−2
−2600%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 170
+1789%
|
9−10
−1789%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 66
+2100%
|
3−4
−2100%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 50
+2400%
|
2−3
−2400%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 93
+2225%
|
4−5
−2225%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 125
+1983%
|
6−7
−1983%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 52
+2500%
|
2−3
−2500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 68
+2167%
|
3−4
−2167%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120
+1800%
|
6−7
−1800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+2150%
|
4−5
−2150%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 87
+2075%
|
4−5
−2075%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
+2100%
|
4−5
−2100%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+1900%
|
8−9
−1900%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 89
+2125%
|
4−5
−2125%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 36
+3500%
|
1−2
−3500%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 250−260
+1992%
|
12−14
−1992%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 41
+1950%
|
2−3
−1950%
|
| Dota 2 | 118
+1867%
|
6−7
−1867%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 64
+2033%
|
3−4
−2033%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120
+1800%
|
6−7
−1800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+2150%
|
4−5
−2150%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 77
+1825%
|
4−5
−1825%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 86
+2050%
|
4−5
−2050%
|
| Metro Exodus | 49
+2350%
|
2−3
−2350%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
+2100%
|
4−5
−2100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 81
+1925%
|
4−5
−1925%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+1900%
|
8−9
−1900%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 83
+1975%
|
4−5
−1975%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 34
+3300%
|
1−2
−3300%
|
| Dota 2 | 112
+2140%
|
5−6
−2140%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 61
+1933%
|
3−4
−1933%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+2150%
|
4−5
−2150%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
+2100%
|
4−5
−2100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 46
+2200%
|
2−3
−2200%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+1900%
|
8−9
−1900%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 110−120
+1800%
|
6−7
−1800%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+2300%
|
2−3
−2300%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 160−170
+1925%
|
8−9
−1925%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 48
+2300%
|
2−3
−2300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 29
+2800%
|
1−2
−2800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1833%
|
9−10
−1833%
|
| Valorant | 190−200
+1870%
|
10−11
−1870%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 66
+2100%
|
3−4
−2100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 49
+2350%
|
2−3
−2350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+1833%
|
3−4
−1833%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+3500%
|
1−2
−3500%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 50−55
+2600%
|
2−3
−2600%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+2100%
|
1−2
−2100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 44
+2100%
|
2−3
−2100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 17 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 29
+2800%
|
1−2
−2800%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+1786%
|
7−8
−1786%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35
+3400%
|
1−2
−3400%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+2100%
|
1−2
−2100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 62
+1967%
|
3−4
−1967%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 19
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+1900%
|
2−3
−1900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
+2300%
|
1−2
−2300%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 24−27
+2300%
|
1−2
−2300%
|
This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and ATI Mobility compete in popular games:
- RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 1867% faster in 1080p
- RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 2050% faster in 1440p
- RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 2600% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 22.22 | 1.18 |
| Recency | 11 May 2021 | 1 December 2001 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 180 nm |
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 1783% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
