Riva 128 PCI vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking285not rated
Place by popularity43not in top-100
Power efficiency28.37no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)no data
GPU code nameGN20-P0NV3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)1 April 1997 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1238 MHz100 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data4 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)4 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.1
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_25.0
OpenGLno data1.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2021 1 April 1997
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 4 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has an age advantage of 24 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4275% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128 PCI, on the other hand, has 1400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Riva 128 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Riva 128 PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
NVIDIA Riva 128 PCI
Riva 128 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1850 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 11 votes

Rate Riva 128 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or Riva 128 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.