Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Arc Graphics 140V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
21.12
+81.3%

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking242396
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Power efficiency27.92no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameGN20-P0Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488
Core clock speed1238 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology8 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed12000 MHzno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212_2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 21.12
+81.3%
Arc Graphics 140V 11.65

  • Other tests
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
    • 3DMark Time Spy Graphics

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 15712
+47%
Arc Graphics 140V 10688

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 43216
+10.7%
Arc Graphics 140V 39055

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 11949
+25.9%
Arc Graphics 140V 9492

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 65252
+23.1%
Arc Graphics 140V 53014

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 4497
+11.4%
Arc Graphics 140V 4038

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
+55%
40
−55%
1440p43
+115%
20
−115%
4K26
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 71
+12.7%
63
−12.7%
Counter-Strike 2 170
+95.4%
87
−95.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+154%
24−27
−154%
Atomic Heart 54
+22.7%
44
−22.7%
Battlefield 5 93
+69.1%
55−60
−69.1%
Counter-Strike 2 125
+47.1%
85
−47.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+100%
24−27
−100%
Far Cry 5 68
+33.3%
51
−33.3%
Fortnite 110−120
+57.5%
70−75
−57.5%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+70.4%
50−55
−70.4%
Forza Horizon 5 87
+118%
40−45
−118%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+93.5%
45−50
−93.5%
Valorant 160−170
+46.4%
110−120
−46.4%
Atomic Heart 32
+6.7%
30
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 89
+61.8%
55−60
−61.8%
Counter-Strike 2 36
−16.7%
42
+16.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+41.6%
170−180
−41.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+57.7%
24−27
−57.7%
Dota 2 118
+81.5%
65−70
−81.5%
Far Cry 5 64
+42.2%
45
−42.2%
Fortnite 110−120
+57.5%
70−75
−57.5%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+70.4%
50−55
−70.4%
Forza Horizon 5 77
+92.5%
40−45
−92.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+95.5%
44
−95.5%
Metro Exodus 49
+88.5%
24−27
−88.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+93.5%
45−50
−93.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+30.6%
62
−30.6%
Valorant 160−170
+46.4%
110−120
−46.4%
Battlefield 5 83
+50.9%
55−60
−50.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+30.8%
24−27
−30.8%
Dota 2 112
+86.7%
60−65
−86.7%
Far Cry 5 61
+45.2%
42
−45.2%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+70.4%
50−55
−70.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+93.5%
45−50
−93.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+64.3%
28
−64.3%
Valorant 160−170
+46.4%
110−120
−46.4%
Fortnite 110−120
+57.5%
70−75
−57.5%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+108%
24−27
−108%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+71.6%
95−100
−71.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+167%
18
−167%
Metro Exodus 29
+93.3%
14−16
−93.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+64.2%
100−110
−64.2%
Valorant 200−210
+48.1%
130−140
−48.1%
Battlefield 5 66
+94.1%
30−35
−94.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Far Cry 5 49
+40%
35
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+90.3%
30−35
−90.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+95%
20−22
−95%
Fortnite 55−60
+96.4%
27−30
−96.4%
Atomic Heart 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Metro Exodus 17
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+70.6%
16−18
−70.6%
Valorant 130−140
+97.1%
65−70
−97.1%
Battlefield 5 35
+106%
16−18
−106%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Dota 2 62
+107%
30−33
−107%
Far Cry 5 19
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+81.8%
21−24
−81.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Fortnite 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 55% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 115% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 86% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 188% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 140V is 17% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is ahead in 59 tests (98%)
  • Arc Graphics 140V is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.12 11.65
Recency 11 May 2021 24 September 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 3 nm

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 81.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4
1502 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6
29 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or Arc Graphics 140V, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.