Radeon PRO W7500 vs GeForce RTX 2080

Place in performance ranking	57	129
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	26.29	78.54
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Turing TU104	Navi 33
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	27 August 2018 (5 years ago)	3 August 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	$429
Current price	$426 (0.6x MSRP)	$409 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7500 has 199% better value for money than RTX 2080.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2944	1792
Core clock speed	1515 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1710 MHz	1700 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	215 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	314.6	190.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	216 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	10.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	172.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 48.68
+37%

PRO W7500 35.53

GeForce RTX 2080 outperforms Radeon PRO W7500 by 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 2080 18803
+37%

PRO W7500 13722

GeForce RTX 2080 outperforms Radeon PRO W7500 by 37% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	145 +45%	100−110 −45%
1440p	100 +42.9%	70−75 −42.9%
4K	71 +42%	50−55 −42%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

85−90
+48.3%

60−65

−48.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	105 +40%	75−80 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	98 +40%	70−75 −40%
Battlefield 5	194 +38.6%	140−150 −38.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	132 +38.9%	95−100 −38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 +48.3%	60−65 −48.3%
Far Cry 5	127 +41.1%	90−95 −41.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	165 +37.5%	120−130 −37.5%
Forza Horizon 4	156 +41.8%	110−120 −41.8%
Hitman 3	135 +42.1%	95−100 −42.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	246 +44.7%	170−180 −44.7%
Metro Exodus	144 +44%	100−105 −44%
Red Dead Redemption 2	109 +45.3%	75−80 −45.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	200−210 +45%	140−150 −45%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110 +37.5%	80−85 −37.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	91 +40%	65−70 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	83 +38.3%	60−65 −38.3%
Battlefield 5	182 +40%	130−140 −40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	117 +37.6%	85−90 −37.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 +48.3%	60−65 −48.3%
Far Cry 5	102 +45.7%	70−75 −45.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	126 +40%	90−95 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	243 +42.9%	170−180 −42.9%
Hitman 3	107 +42.7%	75−80 −42.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	254 +41.1%	180−190 −41.1%
Metro Exodus	123 +44.7%	85−90 −44.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	102 +45.7%	70−75 −45.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	200−210 +45%	140−150 −45%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	181 +39.2%	130−140 −39.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	243 +42.9%	170−180 −42.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	68 +51.1%	45−50 −51.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	73 +46%	50−55 −46%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90 +38.5%	65−70 −38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 +48.3%	60−65 −48.3%
Far Cry 5	81 +47.3%	55−60 −47.3%
Forza Horizon 4	132 +38.9%	95−100 −38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	169 +40.8%	120−130 −40.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	200−210 +45%	140−150 −45%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	106 +41.3%	75−80 −41.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	79 +43.6%	55−60 −43.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

99
+41.4%

70−75

−41.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	123 +44.7%	85−90 −44.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	138 +38%	100−105 −38%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	58 +45%	40−45 −45%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60 +50%	40−45 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	91 +40%	65−70 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +43.3%	30−33 −43.3%
Far Cry 5	99 +41.4%	70−75 −41.4%
Forza Horizon 4	118 +38.8%	85−90 −38.8%
Hitman 3	80 +45.5%	55−60 −45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	129 +43.3%	90−95 −43.3%
Metro Exodus	89 +48.3%	60−65 −48.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +37.8%	90−95 −37.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +40%	55−60 −40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	58 +45%	40−45 −45%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95
+46.2%

65−70

−46.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	66 +46.7%	45−50 −46.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	50 +42.9%	35−40 −42.9%
Hitman 3	48 +37.1%	35−40 −37.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +46.7%	45−50 −46.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	47 +56.7%	30−33 −56.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	76 +38.2%	55−60 −38.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	41 +51.9%	27−30 −51.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	38 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Far Cry 5	39 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	81 +47.3%	55−60 −47.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	76 +38.2%	55−60 −38.2%
Metro Exodus	62 +37.8%	45−50 −37.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%