Quadro T600 Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2080

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 with Quadro T600 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 215 Watt
48.81
+166%

RTX 2080 outperforms T600 Mobile by a whopping 166% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking65302
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.00no data
Power efficiency15.6631.62
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU104TU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date20 September 2018 (6 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2944896
Core clock speed1515 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speed1710 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate314.678.96
Floating-point processing power10.07 TFLOPS2.527 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs18456
Tensor Cores368no data
Ray Tracing Cores46no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 48.81
+166%
T600 Mobile 18.33

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 18768
+166%
T600 Mobile 7049

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2080 40278
+284%
T600 Mobile 10498

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2080 66631
+70.4%
T600 Mobile 39112

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2080 17810
+125%
T600 Mobile 7928

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2080 143576
+166%
T600 Mobile 53941

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD144
+182%
51
−182%
1440p101
+189%
35−40
−189%
4K72
+167%
27−30
−167%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.85no data
1440p6.92no data
4K9.71no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+170%
40−45
−170%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+200%
35−40
−200%
Elden Ring 170−180
+240%
52
−240%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90
+52.5%
55−60
−52.5%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+170%
40−45
−170%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+38.9%
35−40
−38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+230%
75−80
−230%
Metro Exodus 105
+200%
35−40
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 109
+153%
40−45
−153%
Valorant 249
+236%
70−75
−236%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 188
+219%
55−60
−219%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+170%
40−45
−170%
Cyberpunk 2077 43
+19.4%
35−40
−19.4%
Dota 2 87
−33.3%
116
+33.3%
Elden Ring 170−180
+421%
34
−421%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+118%
49
−118%
Fortnite 193
+94.9%
95−100
−94.9%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+230%
75−80
−230%
Grand Theft Auto V 131
+108%
63
−108%
Metro Exodus 88
+76%
50−55
−76%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 245
+94.4%
120−130
−94.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80
+86%
40−45
−86%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+235%
52
−235%
Valorant 145
+95.9%
70−75
−95.9%
World of Tanks 270−280
+26.8%
220−230
−26.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 79
+33.9%
55−60
−33.9%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+170%
40−45
−170%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
+5.6%
35−40
−5.6%
Dota 2 140−150
+31.8%
107
−31.8%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+138%
45
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+230%
75−80
−230%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160
+27%
120−130
−27%
Valorant 223
+179%
80−85
−179%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 90−95
+169%
35−40
−169%
Elden Ring 100−110
+260%
30−33
−260%
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95
+224%
27−30
−224%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+169%
65−70
−169%
Red Dead Redemption 2 52
+225%
16−18
−225%
World of Tanks 300−350
+182%
110−120
−182%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80
+116%
35−40
−116%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+206%
18−20
−206%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+219%
45−50
−219%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+226%
45−50
−226%
Metro Exodus 89
+197%
30−33
−197%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+210%
30−33
−210%
Valorant 161
+168%
60−65
−168%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+200%
18−20
−200%
Dota 2 107
+168%
40−45
−168%
Elden Ring 50−55
+308%
12−14
−308%
Grand Theft Auto V 107
+245%
30−35
−245%
Metro Exodus 39
+200%
12−14
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 146
+192%
50−55
−192%
Red Dead Redemption 2 34
+183%
12−14
−183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 107
+245%
30−35
−245%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60
+233%
18−20
−233%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+200%
18−20
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Dota 2 100−110
+232%
30−35
−232%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+248%
21−24
−248%
Fortnite 75−80
+181%
27−30
−181%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+215%
27−30
−215%
Valorant 88
+193%
30−33
−193%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Elden Ring 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how RTX 2080 and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 is 182% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 is 189% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 is 167% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Elden Ring, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2080 is 421% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T600 Mobile is 33% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 is ahead in 43 tests (75%)
  • T600 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (23%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.81 18.33
Recency 20 September 2018 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 40 Watt

RTX 2080 has a 166.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T600 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 437.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T600 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 is a desktop card while Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2255 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 35 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.