GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX 2080

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 and GeForce RTX 4070, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2080
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 215 Watt
48.72

RTX 4070 outperforms RTX 2080 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6420
Place by popularitynot in top-10032
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.6060.20
Power efficiency15.7524.30
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU104AD104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date20 September 2018 (6 years ago)12 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 has 118% better value for money than RTX 2080.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores29445888
Core clock speed1515 MHz1920 MHz
Boost clock speed1710 MHz2475 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate314.6455.4
Floating-point processing power10.07 TFLOPS29.15 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs184184
Tensor Cores368184
Ray Tracing Cores4646

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm240 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 48.72
RTX 4070 69.93
+43.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 18798
RTX 4070 26979
+43.5%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2080 40278
RTX 4070 59969
+48.9%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2080 66631
RTX 4070 128530
+92.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2080 17810
RTX 4070 43824
+146%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2080 143576
RTX 4070 193559
+34.8%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2080 436117
RTX 4070 773592
+77.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD143
−53.1%
219
+53.1%
1440p99
−24.2%
123
+24.2%
4K70
−8.6%
76
+8.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.892.74
1440p7.064.87
4K9.997.88

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−143%
216
+143%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 105
−37.1%
140−150
+37.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 98
−27.6%
120−130
+27.6%
Battlefield 5 194
−14.9%
220−230
+14.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 132
+10.9%
110−120
−10.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−95.5%
174
+95.5%
Far Cry 5 127
+8.5%
110−120
−8.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 165
−3.6%
170−180
+3.6%
Forza Horizon 4 262
+10.1%
230−240
−10.1%
Hitman 3 135
+4.7%
120−130
−4.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 263
+3.5%
250−260
−3.5%
Metro Exodus 144
−7.6%
150−160
+7.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 109
−11.9%
120−130
+11.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 215
−36.7%
290−300
+36.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 253
+65.4%
150−160
−65.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 153
+6.3%
140−150
−6.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 83
−50.6%
120−130
+50.6%
Battlefield 5 182
−22.5%
220−230
+22.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 117
−1.7%
110−120
+1.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−60.7%
143
+60.7%
Far Cry 5 102
−14.7%
110−120
+14.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 126
−35.7%
170−180
+35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 243
+2.1%
230−240
−2.1%
Hitman 3 131
+1.6%
120−130
−1.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 254
+0%
250−260
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
−7.6%
150−160
+7.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 117
−4.3%
120−130
+4.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180−190
−101%
376
+101%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
−48.5%
150−160
+48.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 243
+58.8%
150−160
−58.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 68
−112%
140−150
+112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 73
−71.2%
120−130
+71.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90
−32.2%
110−120
+32.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−43.8%
128
+43.8%
Far Cry 5 81
−44.4%
110−120
+44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 132
−80.3%
230−240
+80.3%
Hitman 3 115
−12.2%
120−130
+12.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 169
−73.4%
293
+73.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180−190
−72.2%
322
+72.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 106
−60.4%
170
+60.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 79
−57%
124
+57%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 99
−23.2%
120−130
+23.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 123
−34.1%
160−170
+34.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 88
−26.1%
110−120
+26.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58
−41.4%
80−85
+41.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
−48.3%
85−90
+48.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 69
−18.8%
80−85
+18.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−88.4%
81
+88.4%
Far Cry 5 70
−17.1%
80−85
+17.1%
Forza Horizon 4 212
−27.8%
270−280
+27.8%
Hitman 3 80
−27.5%
100−110
+27.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 129
−72.1%
222
+72.1%
Metro Exodus 89
−60.7%
143
+60.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
−79%
222
+79%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−63.6%
120−130
+63.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 239
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95
−21.1%
110−120
+21.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 66
−33.3%
85−90
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 50
−38%
65−70
+38%
Hitman 3 48
−27.1%
60−65
+27.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 117
−93.2%
220−230
+93.2%
Metro Exodus 82
−35.4%
110−120
+35.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
−51.3%
115
+51.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
−41.5%
55−60
+41.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
−36.8%
50−55
+36.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−89.5%
36
+89.5%
Far Cry 5 39
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%
Forza Horizon 4 81
−49.4%
120−130
+49.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
−72.9%
121
+72.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35
−42.9%
50
+42.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 59
−28.8%
75−80
+28.8%

This is how RTX 2080 and RTX 4070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 is 53% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 is 24% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 is 9% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2080 is 65% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 4070 is 143% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 is ahead in 10 tests (14%)
  • RTX 4070 is ahead in 60 tests (83%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.72 69.93
Recency 20 September 2018 12 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 200 Watt

RTX 4070 has a 43.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 7.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2080 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2162 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 8985 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.