To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile vs RTX A5000 Mobile
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1380
- Max video memory 8 GB
- Memory type GDDR6
- Memory clock speed 14000
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
Place in performance rating | 63 | 71 |
Value for money | 5.48 | no data |
Architecture | Turing (2018−2021) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
GPU code name | N18E-G3 TU104 | GA104 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 6 January 2019 (3 years ago) | 12 April 2021 (1 year ago) |
Price now | $2003 | no data |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2944 | no data |
Core clock speed | 1380 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 13,600 million | 17,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 8 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 150 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 292.6 | 302.4 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile and RTX A5000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | large |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR6 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
G-SYNC support | + | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
VR Ready | + | no data |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | no data |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 8.6 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 143
+34.9%
| 106
−34.9%
|
1440p | 94
+38.2%
| 68
−38.2%
|
4K | 65
+38.3%
| 47
−38.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 90
+83.7%
|
45−50
−83.7%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 87
+14.5%
|
76
−14.5%
|
Battlefield 5 | 132
+169%
|
45−50
−169%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 171
+249%
|
45−50
−249%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 94
+0%
|
94
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 104
+11.8%
|
93
−11.8%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 102
+20%
|
85
−20%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 147
+200%
|
45−50
−200%
|
Hitman 3 | 183
+24.5%
|
147
−24.5%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 121
+11%
|
109
−11%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 119
+143%
|
45−50
−143%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 115
+5.5%
|
109
−5.5%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 114
+78.1%
|
64
−78.1%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 83
+69.4%
|
45−50
−69.4%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 74
+15.6%
|
64
−15.6%
|
Battlefield 5 | 118
+141%
|
45−50
−141%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 151
+208%
|
45−50
−208%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 77
−2.6%
|
79
+2.6%
|
Far Cry 5 | 97
+7.8%
|
90
−7.8%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 105
+34.6%
|
78
−34.6%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 145
+196%
|
45−50
−196%
|
Hitman 3 | 159
+20.5%
|
132
−20.5%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 94
−2.1%
|
96
+2.1%
|
Metro Exodus | 90
+12.5%
|
80
−12.5%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71
+44.9%
|
45−50
−44.9%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 109
+9%
|
100
−9%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 174
+16%
|
150
−16%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 101
+68.3%
|
60
−68.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 67
+36.7%
|
45−50
−36.7%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 66
+20%
|
55
−20%
|
Battlefield 5 | 117
+139%
|
45−50
−139%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 67
−1.5%
|
68
+1.5%
|
Far Cry 5 | 96
+12.9%
|
85
−12.9%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 93
+31%
|
71
−31%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 139
+184%
|
45−50
−184%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 95
+5.6%
|
90
−5.6%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 71
+57.8%
|
45
−57.8%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 102
+108%
|
45−50
−108%
|
Hitman 3 | 103
+18.4%
|
87
−18.4%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 65
−12.3%
|
73
+12.3%
|
Metro Exodus | 55
+25%
|
44
−25%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 44
−11.4%
|
45−50
+11.4%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 71
+0%
|
71
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 42 | no data |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 55
+12.2%
|
45−50
−12.2%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 52
+18.2%
|
44
−18.2%
|
Battlefield 5 | 115
+135%
|
45−50
−135%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 45
+2.3%
|
44
−2.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 82
+3.8%
|
79
−3.8%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 89
+43.5%
|
62
−43.5%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 122
+149%
|
45−50
−149%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 53
+23.3%
|
43
−23.3%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 59
+20.4%
|
45−50
−20.4%
|
Hitman 3 | 59
+25.5%
|
47
−25.5%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 38
−5.3%
|
40
+5.3%
|
Metro Exodus | 35
+34.6%
|
26
−34.6%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30
−63.3%
|
45−50
+63.3%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 42
+10.5%
|
38
−10.5%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65
+12.1%
|
58
−12.1%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 38
−28.9%
|
45−50
+28.9%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 34
+17.2%
|
29
−17.2%
|
Battlefield 5 | 68
+38.8%
|
45−50
−38.8%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 22
+4.8%
|
21
−4.8%
|
Far Cry 5 | 52
+18.2%
|
44
−18.2%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 56
+30.2%
|
43
−30.2%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 82
+67.3%
|
45−50
−67.3%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 31
+19.2%
|
26
−19.2%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating | 50.78 | 49.26 |
Novelty | 6 January 2019 | 12 April 2021 |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 8 nm |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile from AMD is Radeon RX 6800S, which is slower by 8% and lower by 20 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile:
Competitors of RTX A5000 Mobile by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to RTX A5000 Mobile from AMD is Radeon RX 6800S, which is slower by 5% and lower by 12 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to RTX A5000 Mobile:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.