Radeon RX 7700 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Place in the ranking	45	40
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	21.84	no data
Power efficiency	15.57	20.18
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	TU102	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	20 September 2018 (6 years ago)	2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	$479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4352	3072
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	1900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	18,600 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	200 Watt
Texture fill rate	420.2	499.2
Floating-point processing power	13.45 TFLOPS	31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs	88	96
TMUs	272	192
Tensor Cores	544	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	68	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	11 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	352 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	616.0 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	+
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Ti 56.42

RX 7700 58.49
+3.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 Ti 21696

RX 7700 22490
+3.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	165 −3%	170−180 +3%
1440p	122 +1.7%	120−130 −1.7%
4K	93 −2.2%	95−100 +2.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	6.05 −115%	2.82 +115%
1440p	8.19 −105%	3.99 +105%
4K	10.74 −113%	5.04 +113%

RX 7700 has 115% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 7700 has 105% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 7700 has 113% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	120−130 −0.8%	130−140 +0.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	120−130 −2.4%	130−140 +2.4%
Elden Ring	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	85 +0%	85−90 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	120−130 −0.8%	130−140 +0.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	57 +3.6%	55−60 −3.6%
Forza Horizon 4	300−350 +0.3%	300−310 −0.3%
Metro Exodus	110 +0%	110−120 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	106 +6%	100−105 −6%
Valorant	290 −3.4%	300−310 +3.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	235 −2.1%	240−250 +2.1%
Counter-Strike 2	120−130 −0.8%	130−140 +0.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 −1.9%	55−60 +1.9%
Dota 2	138 −1.4%	140−150 +1.4%
Elden Ring	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Far Cry 5	92 −3.3%	95−100 +3.3%
Fortnite	224 −2.7%	230−240 +2.7%
Forza Horizon 4	300−350 +0.3%	300−310 −0.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	134 +3.1%	130−140 −3.1%
Metro Exodus	100 +0%	100−105 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	249 −0.4%	250−260 +0.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90 +0%	90−95 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 −3.4%	180−190 +3.4%
Valorant	170 +0%	170−180 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 −0.4%	280−290 +0.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	74 −1.4%	75−80 +1.4%
Counter-Strike 2	120−130 −0.8%	130−140 +0.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	48 +6.7%	45−50 −6.7%
Dota 2	141 +0.7%	140−150 −0.7%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +4.5%	110−120 −4.5%
Forza Horizon 4	300−350 +0.3%	300−310 −0.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	183 +1.7%	180−190 −1.7%
Valorant	259 −0.4%	260−270 +0.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Elden Ring	130−140 +3.1%	130−140 −3.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −2.9%	180−190 +2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	63 −3.2%	65−70 +3.2%
World of Tanks	350−400 +4.9%	350−400 −4.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	74 −1.4%	75−80 +1.4%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −2.9%	70−75 +2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	32 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +1.7%	180−190 −1.7%
Metro Exodus	98 −2%	100−105 +2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +3.6%	110−120 −3.6%
Valorant	204 −2.9%	210−220 +2.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Dota 2	142 +1.4%	140−150 −1.4%
Elden Ring	65−70 −2.9%	70−75 +2.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	142 +1.4%	140−150 −1.4%
Metro Exodus	51 +2%	50−55 −2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	209 −0.5%	210−220 +0.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	42 +5%	40−45 −5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	142 +1.4%	140−150 −1.4%
World of Tanks	270 +0%	270−280 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	62 +3.3%	60−65 −3.3%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 +0%	16−18 +0%
Dota 2	139 −0.7%	140−150 +0.7%
Far Cry 5	105 +5%	100−105 −5%
Fortnite	96 +1.1%	95−100 −1.1%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +3%	100−105 −3%
Valorant	113 +2.7%	110−120 −2.7%

This is how RTX 2080 Ti and RX 7700 compete in popular games:

RX 7700 is 3% faster in 1080p
RTX 2080 Ti is 2% faster in 1440p
RX 7700 is 2% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	56.42	58.49
Maximum RAM amount	11 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	200 Watt

RX 7700 has a 3.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 9.1% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and Radeon RX 7700.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.