GMA 3150 vs GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

Place in the ranking	91	1530
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	25.69	0.05
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code name	GA104	Pineview
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	12 January 2021 (4 years ago)	9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	6144	16
Core clock speed	1110 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	17,400 million	123 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	13 Watt
Texture fill rate	296.6	0.8
Floating-point processing power	18.98 TFLOPS	0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	1
TMUs	192	2
Tensor Cores	192	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	9.0c
Shader Model	6.5	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.0
OpenCL	2.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.2	N/A
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3080 Mobile 42.82
+428100%

GMA 3150 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3080 Mobile 16465
+823150%

GMA 3150 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	120	-0−1
1440p	73	-0−1
4K	46	-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	103	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	134	0−1
Elden Ring	132	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	100	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	108	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	261	0−1
Metro Exodus	108	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85	0−1
Valorant	198	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	86	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	90	0−1
Dota 2	132	0−1
Elden Ring	204	0−1
Far Cry 5	83	0−1
Fortnite	180−190	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	213	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	131	0−1
Metro Exodus	91	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	74	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160	0−1
Valorant	111	0−1
World of Tanks	270−280	0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	75	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	80	0−1
Dota 2	128	0−1
Far Cry 5	100−110	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	185	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210	0−1
Valorant	179	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	94	0−1
Elden Ring	111	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	94	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	49	0−1
World of Tanks	270−280	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	47	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	21	0−1
Far Cry 5	130−140	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	141	0−1
Metro Exodus	90	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	79	0−1
Valorant	134	0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45−50	0−1
Dota 2	93	0−1
Elden Ring	57	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	93	0−1
Metro Exodus	37	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	32	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	93	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	45−50	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	11	0−1
Dota 2	110	0−1
Far Cry 5	65−70	0−1
Fortnite	60−65	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	79	0−1
Valorant	76	0−1