Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Ti with Quadro P3200 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080 Ti
2018
11 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
56.24
+139%

RTX 2080 Ti outperforms P3200 Max-Q by a whopping 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking48246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.59no data
Power efficiency15.4321.55
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU102GP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date20 September 2018 (6 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43521792
Core clock speed1350 MHz1139 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1404 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate420.2157.2
Floating-point processing power13.45 TFLOPS5.032 TFLOPS
ROPs8864
TMUs272112
Tensor Cores544no data
Ray Tracing Cores68no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount11 GB6 GB
Memory bus width352 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth616.0 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.56.1
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 2080 Ti 56.24
+139%
P3200 Max-Q 23.56

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 Ti 21670
+139%
P3200 Max-Q 9077

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD167
+157%
65−70
−157%
1440p125
+150%
50−55
−150%
4K94
+169%
35−40
−169%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.98no data
1440p7.99no data
4K10.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 160−170
+149%
65−70
−149%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+160%
50−55
−160%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+154%
50−55
−154%
Atomic Heart 160−170
+149%
65−70
−149%
Battlefield 5 170
+143%
70−75
−143%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+160%
50−55
−160%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+154%
50−55
−154%
Far Cry 5 136
+147%
55−60
−147%
Fortnite 302
+152%
120−130
−152%
Forza Horizon 4 182
+143%
75−80
−143%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+157%
60−65
−157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 201
+151%
80−85
−151%
Valorant 285
+159%
110−120
−159%
Atomic Heart 160−170
+149%
65−70
−149%
Battlefield 5 164
+152%
65−70
−152%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+160%
50−55
−160%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+153%
110−120
−153%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+154%
50−55
−154%
Dota 2 146
+143%
60−65
−143%
Far Cry 5 130
+160%
50−55
−160%
Fortnite 232
+144%
95−100
−144%
Forza Horizon 4 181
+141%
75−80
−141%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+157%
60−65
−157%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+144%
55−60
−144%
Metro Exodus 107
+168%
40−45
−168%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 193
+141%
80−85
−141%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 247
+147%
100−105
−147%
Valorant 267
+143%
110−120
−143%
Battlefield 5 159
+145%
65−70
−145%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+160%
50−55
−160%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+154%
50−55
−154%
Dota 2 141
+156%
55−60
−156%
Far Cry 5 122
+144%
50−55
−144%
Forza Horizon 4 168
+140%
70−75
−140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 191
+139%
80−85
−139%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
+145%
55−60
−145%
Valorant 259
+159%
100−105
−159%
Fortnite 216
+140%
90−95
−140%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+146%
150−160
−146%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+144%
45−50
−144%
Metro Exodus 76
+153%
30−33
−153%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+150%
70−75
−150%
Valorant 266
+142%
110−120
−142%
Battlefield 5 134
+144%
55−60
−144%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+152%
27−30
−152%
Far Cry 5 117
+160%
45−50
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 147
+145%
60−65
−145%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+144%
45−50
−144%
Fortnite 151
+152%
60−65
−152%
Atomic Heart 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270
+145%
110−120
−145%
Grand Theft Auto V 142
+158%
55−60
−158%
Metro Exodus 51
+143%
21−24
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+145%
40−45
−145%
Valorant 259
+159%
100−105
−159%
Battlefield 5 86
+146%
35−40
−146%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Dota 2 139
+153%
55−60
−153%
Far Cry 5 78
+160%
30−33
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 107
+168%
40−45
−168%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 88
+151%
35−40
−151%
Fortnite 79
+163%
30−33
−163%

This is how RTX 2080 Ti and P3200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Ti is 157% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Ti is 150% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Ti is 169% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 56.24 23.56
Recency 20 September 2018 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

RTX 2080 Ti has a 138.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, a 83.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

P3200 Max-Q, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3200 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1
4386 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7
21 vote

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2080 Ti or Quadro P3200 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.