Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Ti with Quadro P5200 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080 Ti
2018
11 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
56.35
+73.5%

RTX 2080 Ti outperforms P5200 Max-Q by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking44167
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.40no data
Power efficiency15.5822.45
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU102GP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date20 September 2018 (6 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43522560
Core clock speed1350 MHz1316 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1569 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate420.2251.0
Floating-point processing power13.45 TFLOPS8.033 TFLOPS
ROPs8864
TMUs272160
Tensor Cores544no data
Ray Tracing Cores68no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount11 GB16 GB
Memory bus width352 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1804 MHz
Memory bandwidth616.0 GB/s230.9 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.56.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Ti 56.35
+73.5%
P5200 Max-Q 32.48

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 Ti 21736
+73.5%
P5200 Max-Q 12530

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD162
+80%
90−95
−80%
1440p117
+80%
65−70
−80%
4K94
+88%
50−55
−88%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.17no data
1440p8.54no data
4K10.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+76.7%
60−65
−76.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 125
+78.6%
70−75
−78.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 107
+78.3%
60−65
−78.3%
Battlefield 5 244
+74.3%
140−150
−74.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+78.3%
60−65
−78.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+76.7%
60−65
−76.7%
Far Cry 5 163
+81.1%
90−95
−81.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 197
+79.1%
110−120
−79.1%
Forza Horizon 4 346
+82.1%
190−200
−82.1%
Hitman 3 161
+78.9%
90−95
−78.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 285
+78.1%
160−170
−78.1%
Metro Exodus 144
+80%
80−85
−80%
Red Dead Redemption 2 106
+76.7%
60−65
−76.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 216
+80%
120−130
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 266
+77.3%
150−160
−77.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 181
+81%
100−105
−81%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 91
+82%
50−55
−82%
Battlefield 5 224
+86.7%
120−130
−86.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+78.3%
60−65
−78.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+76.7%
60−65
−76.7%
Far Cry 5 132
+76%
75−80
−76%
Far Cry New Dawn 152
+78.8%
85−90
−78.8%
Forza Horizon 4 321
+78.3%
180−190
−78.3%
Hitman 3 156
+83.5%
85−90
−83.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 267
+78%
150−160
−78%
Metro Exodus 144
+80%
80−85
−80%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+73.8%
65−70
−73.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230
+87.5%
120−130
−87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+80%
65−70
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 255
+82.1%
140−150
−82.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 82
+82.2%
45−50
−82.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80
+77.8%
45−50
−77.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 103
+87.3%
55−60
−87.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+76.7%
60−65
−76.7%
Far Cry 5 91
+82%
50−55
−82%
Forza Horizon 4 168
+76.8%
95−100
−76.8%
Hitman 3 139
+73.8%
80−85
−73.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 202
+83.6%
110−120
−83.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230
+87.5%
120−130
−87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
+80%
75−80
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90
+80%
50−55
−80%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 104
+89.1%
55−60
−89.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 166
+74.7%
95−100
−74.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 112
+86.7%
60−65
−86.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 72
+80%
40−45
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 67
+91.4%
35−40
−91.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 82
+82.2%
45−50
−82.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
Far Cry 5 84
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%
Forza Horizon 4 313
+73.9%
180−190
−73.9%
Hitman 3 100
+81.8%
55−60
−81.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 162
+80%
90−95
−80%
Metro Exodus 98
+78.2%
55−60
−78.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+75.3%
85−90
−75.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+88%
50−55
−88%
Watch Dogs: Legion 251
+79.3%
140−150
−79.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 105
+75%
60−65
−75%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 87
+74%
50−55
−74%
Far Cry New Dawn 66
+88.6%
35−40
−88.6%
Hitman 3 59
+96.7%
30−33
−96.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130
+85.7%
70−75
−85.7%
Metro Exodus 111
+85%
60−65
−85%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+78.2%
55−60
−78.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50
+85.2%
27−30
−85.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 46
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 52
+92.6%
27−30
−92.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Far Cry 5 50
+85.2%
27−30
−85.2%
Forza Horizon 4 107
+78.3%
60−65
−78.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 44
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 73
+82.5%
40−45
−82.5%

This is how RTX 2080 Ti and P5200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Ti is 80% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Ti is 80% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Ti is 88% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 56.35 32.48
Recency 20 September 2018 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 100 Watt

RTX 2080 Ti has a 73.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

P5200 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 45.5% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5200 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4150 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 14 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.