RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080 Super Mobile
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
38.16

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX 2080 Super Mobile by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11532
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.1833.72
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU104AD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30726144
Core clock speed1365 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate299.5417.6
Floating-point processing power9.585 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs192192
Tensor Cores384192
Ray Tracing Cores4848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB20 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.58.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD136
−54.4%
210−220
+54.4%
1440p94
−59.6%
150−160
+59.6%
4K67
−49.3%
100−110
+49.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−52.9%
130−140
+52.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 104
−53.8%
160−170
+53.8%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−52.9%
130−140
+52.9%
Forza Horizon 4 265
−50.9%
400−450
+50.9%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−58.4%
160−170
+58.4%
Metro Exodus 116
−55.2%
180−190
+55.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 121
−57%
190−200
+57%
Valorant 216
−38.9%
300−310
+38.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−52.4%
160−170
+52.4%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−52.9%
130−140
+52.9%
Dota 2 142
−54.9%
220−230
+54.9%
Far Cry 5 96
−56.3%
150−160
+56.3%
Fortnite 170−180
−57%
270−280
+57%
Forza Horizon 4 217
−38.2%
300−310
+38.2%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−58.4%
160−170
+58.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 136
−54.4%
210−220
+54.4%
Metro Exodus 92
−52.2%
140−150
+52.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
−49.3%
300−310
+49.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 66
−51.5%
100−105
+51.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
−57.1%
220−230
+57.1%
Valorant 127
−57.5%
200−210
+57.5%
World of Tanks 270−280
−43.4%
400−450
+43.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80
−50%
120−130
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−52.9%
130−140
+52.9%
Dota 2 141
−56%
220−230
+56%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−53.1%
150−160
+53.1%
Forza Horizon 4 183
−58.5%
290−300
+58.5%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−58.4%
160−170
+58.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
−49.3%
300−310
+49.3%
Valorant 205
−46.3%
300−310
+46.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 90
−55.6%
140−150
+55.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
−55.6%
140−150
+55.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−60%
280−290
+60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 43
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
World of Tanks 250−260
−59.4%
400−450
+59.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 78
−53.8%
120−130
+53.8%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−50%
60−65
+50%
Far Cry 5 120−130
−56.3%
200−210
+56.3%
Forza Horizon 4 137
−60.6%
220−230
+60.6%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−51.5%
100−105
+51.5%
Metro Exodus 90
−55.6%
140−150
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−59.4%
110−120
+59.4%
Valorant 162
−60.5%
260−270
+60.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Dota 2 97
−54.6%
150−160
+54.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 97
−54.6%
150−160
+54.6%
Metro Exodus 35
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−56.3%
200−210
+56.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 97
−54.6%
150−160
+54.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 48
−56.3%
75−80
+56.3%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Dota 2 141
−56%
220−230
+56%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−52.5%
90−95
+52.5%
Fortnite 55−60
−60.7%
90−95
+60.7%
Forza Horizon 4 78
−53.8%
120−130
+53.8%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−48.6%
55−60
+48.6%
Valorant 89
−57.3%
140−150
+57.3%

This is how RTX 2080 Super Mobile and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 54% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 60% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 49% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.16 61.35
Recency 2 April 2020 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 130 Watt

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a 60.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is a notebook card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 133 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 47 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.