RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile with RTX 5880 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080 Super Mobile
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
37.94

RTX 5880 Ada Generation outperforms RTX 2080 Super Mobile by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.1521.74
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU104AD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)5 January 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307214080
Core clock speed1365 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz2460 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate299.51,082
Floating-point processing power9.585 TFLOPS69.27 TFLOPS
ROPs64176
TMUs192440
Tensor Cores384440
Ray Tracing Cores48110

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.58.9
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD136
−121%
300−350
+121%
1440p94
−123%
210−220
+123%
4K67
−124%
150−160
+124%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−117%
180−190
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−124%
190−200
+124%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 104
−121%
230−240
+121%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−117%
180−190
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−124%
190−200
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 265
−126%
600−650
+126%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−118%
220−230
+118%
Metro Exodus 116
−124%
260−270
+124%
Red Dead Redemption 2 121
−123%
270−280
+123%
Valorant 216
−108%
450−500
+108%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−119%
230−240
+119%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−117%
180−190
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−124%
190−200
+124%
Dota 2 142
−111%
300−310
+111%
Far Cry 5 96
−119%
210−220
+119%
Fortnite 170−180
−103%
350−400
+103%
Forza Horizon 4 217
−107%
450−500
+107%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−118%
220−230
+118%
Grand Theft Auto V 136
−121%
300−310
+121%
Metro Exodus 92
−117%
200−210
+117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
−124%
450−500
+124%
Red Dead Redemption 2 66
−127%
150−160
+127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
−114%
300−310
+114%
Valorant 127
−120%
280−290
+120%
World of Tanks 270−280
−115%
600−650
+115%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80
−125%
180−190
+125%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−117%
180−190
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−124%
190−200
+124%
Dota 2 141
−113%
300−310
+113%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−124%
220−230
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 183
−119%
400−450
+119%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−118%
220−230
+118%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
−124%
450−500
+124%
Valorant 205
−120%
450−500
+120%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 90
−122%
200−210
+122%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
−122%
200−210
+122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−100%
350−400
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 43
−121%
95−100
+121%
World of Tanks 250−260
−119%
550−600
+119%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 78
−118%
170−180
+118%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−120%
55−60
+120%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Far Cry 5 120−130
−127%
290−300
+127%
Forza Horizon 4 137
−119%
300−310
+119%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−127%
150−160
+127%
Metro Exodus 90
−122%
200−210
+122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−117%
150−160
+117%
Valorant 162
−116%
350−400
+116%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Dota 2 97
−127%
220−230
+127%
Grand Theft Auto V 97
−127%
220−230
+127%
Metro Exodus 35
−114%
75−80
+114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−127%
290−300
+127%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
−114%
60−65
+114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 97
−127%
220−230
+127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 48
−108%
100−105
+108%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−106%
35−40
+106%
Dota 2 141
−113%
300−310
+113%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−120%
130−140
+120%
Fortnite 55−60
−114%
120−130
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 78
−118%
170−180
+118%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−116%
80−85
+116%
Valorant 89
−125%
200−210
+125%

This is how RTX 2080 Super Mobile and RTX 5880 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 121% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 123% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 124% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.94 86.32
Recency 2 April 2020 5 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 285 Watt

RTX 2080 Super Mobile has 90% lower power consumption.

RTX 5880 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 127.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is a notebook card while RTX 5880 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation
RTX 5880 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 133 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 20 votes

Rate RTX 5880 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile or RTX 5880 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.