RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RTX 2080 Max-Q
2019
8 GB GDDR6
35.90

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking127126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation23.20no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameN18E-G3-A1 MAX-Q TU104no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$1268 no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores29444608
Core clock speed735-990 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1095-1230 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80-90 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate201.5no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Max-Q 35.90
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 35.99
+0.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 2080 Max-Q 27973
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 29411
+5.1%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q by 5% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 2080 Max-Q 20703
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 20908
+1%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q by 1% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD117
+6.4%
110−120
−6.4%
1440p82
+2.5%
80−85
−2.5%
4K51
+2%
50−55
−2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 81
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Battlefield 5 137
+5.4%
130−140
−5.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 127
+5.8%
120−130
−5.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 105
+5%
100−105
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 95
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+1.8%
110−120
−1.8%
Hitman 3 110−120
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+4%
75−80
−4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 103
+3%
100−105
−3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 102
+2%
100−105
−2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+3.1%
65−70
−3.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 72
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Battlefield 5 126
+5%
120−130
−5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 98
+3.2%
95−100
−3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 97
+2.1%
95−100
−2.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 91
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+1.8%
110−120
−1.8%
Hitman 3 110−120
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+4%
75−80
−4%
Metro Exodus 74
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 59
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 91
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 145
+3.6%
140−150
−3.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+3.1%
65−70
−3.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Battlefield 5 116
+5.5%
110−120
−5.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 93
+3.3%
90−95
−3.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 82
+2.5%
80−85
−2.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+1.8%
110−120
−1.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 78
+4%
75−80
−4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+3.1%
65−70
−3.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Hitman 3 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Battlefield 5 92
+2.2%
90−95
−2.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 76
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 21
+0%
21−24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+6%
50−55
−6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Battlefield 5 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how RTX 2080 Max-Q and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Max-Q is 6.4% faster than RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Max-Q is 2.5% faster than RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Max-Q is 2% faster than RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile in 4K

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 35.90 35.99
Recency 6 January 2019 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 115 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 173 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.