GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample vs RTX 2080 Engineering Sample

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameTU104NV36S
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data18 August 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072no data
Core clock speedno data425 MHz
Boost clock speed1710 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate328.31.700
ROPs644
TMUs1924

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14 GB/s500 MBps
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0a
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (full) 2.0 (partial)
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 25 Watt

RTX 2080 Engineering Sample has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5700 Engineering Sample, on the other hand, has 760% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2080 Engineering Sample and GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Engineering Sample
GeForce RTX 2080 Engineering Sample
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample
GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Engineering Sample on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.