GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon R4 (Kaveri)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R4 (Kaveri) with GeForce GTX 1660, including specs and performance data.

R4 (Kaveri)
2014
0.84

GTX 1660 outperforms R4 (Kaveri) by a whopping 3502% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1131180
Place by popularitynot in top-10052
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.90
Power efficiencyno data17.46
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameKaveriTU116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)14 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921408
Core clock speed533 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors2410 Million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data157.1
Floating-point processing powerno data5.027 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2001 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R4 (Kaveri) 0.84
GTX 1660 30.26
+3502%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R4 (Kaveri) 611
GTX 1660 21064
+3347%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R4 (Kaveri) 1958
GTX 1660 71229
+3538%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R4 (Kaveri) 434
GTX 1660 14164
+3167%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R4 (Kaveri) 3372
GTX 1660 81755
+2325%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R4 (Kaveri) 26079
GTX 1660 570753
+2089%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−938%
83
+938%
1440p1−2
−5000%
51
+5000%
4K0−128

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.64
1440pno data4.29
4Kno data7.82

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2267%
71
+2267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2333%
73
+2333%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1833%
58
+1833%
Far Cry 5 0−1 65−70
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−3750%
75−80
+3750%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1280%
69
+1280%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2450%
306
+2450%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−11100%
112
+11100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−1400%
100−110
+1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−632%
227
+632%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2360%
123
+2360%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2133%
67
+2133%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1467%
47
+1467%
Far Cry 5 0−1 65−70
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−3750%
75−80
+3750%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1240%
67
+1240%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2292%
287
+2292%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−7800%
79
+7800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−1471%
110
+1471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−540%
60−65
+540%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−590%
214
+590%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1533%
49
+1533%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1233%
40
+1233%
Far Cry 5 0−1 65−70
Hitman 3 5−6
−1080%
59
+1080%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−675%
93
+675%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−1257%
95
+1257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−470%
57
+470%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+6.9%
29
−6.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−8000%
81
+8000%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 55−60
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 30−35
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−457%
39
+457%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−1575%
67
+1575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 40−45
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−6133%
187
+6133%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1667%
53
+1667%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 24−27

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 15
Far Cry 5 0−1 16−18

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1200%
26
+1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 59
+0%
59
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+0%
42
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 113
+0%
113
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+0%
98
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27
+0%
27
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67
+0%
67
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Hitman 3 21
+0%
21
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 63
+0%
63
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 17
+0%
17
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+0%
50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 36
+0%
36
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+0%
12
+0%

This is how R4 (Kaveri) and GTX 1660 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 is 938% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 is 5000% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R4 (Kaveri) is 7% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1660 is 11100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R4 (Kaveri) is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • GTX 1660 is ahead in 37 tests (59%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (40%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 30.26
Recency 4 June 2014 14 March 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

GTX 1660 has a 3502.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1660 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R4 (Kaveri) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R4 (Kaveri) is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 11 votes

Rate Radeon R4 (Kaveri) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 5156 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.