Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 2060 Super

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 Super with Radeon 760M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2060 Super
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 175 Watt
42.93
+189%

RTX 2060 Super outperforms 760M by a whopping 189% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking89355
Place by popularity15not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.60no data
Power efficiency16.9368.22
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU106Hawx Point
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 July 2019 (5 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2176512
Core clock speed1470 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2599 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate224.483.17
Floating-point processing power7.181 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs13632
Tensor Cores272no data
Ray Tracing Cores348

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 Super 42.93
+189%
Radeon 760M 14.83

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2060 Super 16509
+190%
Radeon 760M 5701

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2060 Super 29668
+209%
Radeon 760M 9603

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2060 Super 83631
+154%
Radeon 760M 32985

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2060 Super 22243
+262%
Radeon 760M 6142

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2060 Super 121804
+192%
Radeon 760M 41767

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
+281%
31
−281%
1440p67
+253%
19
−253%
4K43
+207%
14−16
−207%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.38no data
1440p5.96no data
4K9.28no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 91
+264%
25
−264%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+193%
30
−193%
Elden Ring 121
+169%
45−50
−169%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90
+87.5%
45−50
−87.5%
Counter-Strike 2 73
+284%
19
−284%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+542%
12
−542%
Forza Horizon 4 228
+347%
51
−347%
Metro Exodus 127
+218%
40−45
−218%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+239%
35−40
−239%
Valorant 202
+242%
55−60
−242%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 156
+225%
45−50
−225%
Counter-Strike 2 64
+256%
18
−256%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+644%
9
−644%
Dota 2 159
+591%
23
−591%
Elden Ring 138
+207%
45−50
−207%
Far Cry 5 122
+321%
29
−321%
Fortnite 149
+79.5%
80−85
−79.5%
Forza Horizon 4 184
+318%
44
−318%
Grand Theft Auto V 139
+309%
34
−309%
Metro Exodus 91
+128%
40−45
−128%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 241
+125%
100−110
−125%
Red Dead Redemption 2 59
+63.9%
35−40
−63.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+244%
45−50
−244%
Valorant 105
+78%
55−60
−78%
World of Tanks 270−280
+45.3%
190−200
−45.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 82
+70.8%
45−50
−70.8%
Counter-Strike 2 59
+127%
24−27
−127%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+100%
27−30
−100%
Dota 2 185
+249%
50−55
−249%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+83.6%
55−60
−83.6%
Forza Horizon 4 156
+322%
37
−322%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 127
+18.7%
100−110
−18.7%
Valorant 180
+205%
55−60
−205%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 86
+310%
21−24
−310%
Elden Ring 78
+239%
21−24
−239%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+291%
21−24
−291%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+33.6%
130−140
−33.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 38
+192%
12−14
−192%
World of Tanks 270−280
+161%
100−110
−161%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 74
+147%
30−33
−147%
Counter-Strike 2 39
+200%
12−14
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
+245%
10−12
−245%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+283%
35−40
−283%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+217%
35−40
−217%
Metro Exodus 87
+172%
30−35
−172%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+305%
18−20
−305%
Valorant 114
+208%
35−40
−208%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 23
+130%
10−11
−130%
Dota 2 83
+219%
24−27
−219%
Elden Ring 34
+240%
10−11
−240%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+219%
24−27
−219%
Metro Exodus 31
+210%
10−11
−210%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 138
+214%
40−45
−214%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+167%
9−10
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 83
+219%
24−27
−219%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+200%
14−16
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Dota 2 121
+365%
24−27
−365%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+247%
18−20
−247%
Fortnite 60−65
+271%
16−18
−271%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+210%
21−24
−210%
Valorant 59
+269%
16−18
−269%

This is how RTX 2060 Super and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Super is 281% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Super is 253% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Super is 207% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 Super is 644% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2060 Super surpassed Radeon 760M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.93 14.83
Recency 9 July 2019 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 2060 Super has a 189.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 760M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 760M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 Super is a desktop card while Radeon 760M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 13023 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 214 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.