UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs GeForce MX570

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX570 and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX570
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
14.83
+107%

MX570 outperforms UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking361555
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.74no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGA107Alder Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateMay 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204864
Core clock speed832 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1155 MHz1400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology8 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate73.92no data
Floating-point processing power4.731 TFLOPSno data
ROPs40no data
TMUs64no data
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD38
+72.7%
22
−72.7%
1440p21−24
+90.9%
11
−90.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+50%
24
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+61.1%
18
−61.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+100%
18
−100%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+107%
27−30
−107%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+93.3%
15
−93.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+161%
18
−161%
Fortnite 75−80
+92.7%
40−45
−92.7%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+96.7%
30−33
−96.7%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+100%
19
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+113%
24−27
−113%
Valorant 110−120
+60.3%
70−75
−60.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+177%
13
−177%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+107%
27−30
−107%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+213%
8
−213%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+72.7%
110−120
−72.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+164%
11
−164%
Dota 2 85−90
+67.9%
53
−67.9%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+147%
19
−147%
Fortnite 75−80
+92.7%
40−45
−92.7%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+96.7%
30−33
−96.7%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+138%
16−18
−138%
Grand Theft Auto V 54
+350%
12
−350%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+164%
11
−164%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+113%
24−27
−113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+65.2%
23
−65.2%
Valorant 110−120
+60.3%
70−75
−60.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+107%
27−30
−107%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
Dota 2 85−90
+81.6%
49
−81.6%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+161%
18
−161%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+96.7%
30−33
−96.7%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+192%
13
−192%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+113%
24−27
−113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+209%
11
−209%
Valorant 110−120
+432%
22
−432%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+92.7%
40−45
−92.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+100%
50−55
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+267%
6
−267%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+236%
35−40
−236%
Valorant 140−150
+90.8%
75−80
−90.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+225%
12−14
−225%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+114%
14
−114%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+113%
16−18
−113%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+127%
10−12
−127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Valorant 75−80
+124%
30−35
−124%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Dota 2 50−55
+108%
24−27
−108%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

This is how GeForce MX570 and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is 73% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX570 is 91% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GeForce MX570 surpassed UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) in all 67 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.83 7.17
Chip lithography 8 nm 10 nm

GeForce MX570 has a 106.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 94 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 488 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX570 or UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.