Tesla M2070 vs GeForce MX450

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX450 with Tesla M2070, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX450
2020
2 GB GDDR5, GDDR6, 25 Watt
8.39
+95.1%

MX450 outperforms Tesla M2070 by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking469644
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.12
Power efficiency26.711.52
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1GF100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2020 (4 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896448
Core clock speed1395 MHz574 MHz
Boost clock speed1575 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)225 Watt
Texture fill rate100.832.14
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS1.03 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs6456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5, GDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz783 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.03 GB/s150.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA7.52.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD29
+107%
14−16
−107%
1440p17
+113%
8−9
−113%
4K25
+108%
12−14
−108%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data221.36
1440pno data387.38
4Kno data258.25

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 88
+95.6%
45−50
−95.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+100%
16−18
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Battlefield 5 49
+104%
24−27
−104%
Counter-Strike 2 67
+123%
30−33
−123%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+120%
10−11
−120%
Far Cry 5 34
+113%
16−18
−113%
Fortnite 61
+103%
30−33
−103%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Forza Horizon 5 34
+113%
16−18
−113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+106%
16−18
−106%
Valorant 85−90
+97.8%
45−50
−97.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Battlefield 5 38
+111%
18−20
−111%
Counter-Strike 2 28
+100%
14−16
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+98.6%
70−75
−98.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+117%
6−7
−117%
Dota 2 88
+95.6%
45−50
−95.6%
Far Cry 5 29
+107%
14−16
−107%
Fortnite 39
+117%
18−20
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Forza Horizon 5 26
+117%
12−14
−117%
Grand Theft Auto V 38
+111%
18−20
−111%
Metro Exodus 10
+100%
5−6
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+106%
16−18
−106%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+106%
16−18
−106%
Valorant 85−90
+97.8%
45−50
−97.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30
+114%
14−16
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
+100%
4−5
−100%
Dota 2 81
+103%
40−45
−103%
Far Cry 5 27
+125%
12−14
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+106%
16−18
−106%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+100%
10−11
−100%
Valorant 85−90
+97.8%
45−50
−97.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25
+108%
12−14
−108%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+100%
35−40
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+120%
5−6
−120%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%
Valorant 100−110
+104%
50−55
−104%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 22
+120%
10−11
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 20
+100%
10−11
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Valorant 45−50
+100%
24−27
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 32
+100%
16−18
−100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

This is how GeForce MX450 and Tesla M2070 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX450 is 107% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX450 is 113% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX450 is 108% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.39 4.30
Recency 1 August 2020 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 225 Watt

GeForce MX450 has a 95.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.

Tesla M2070, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce MX450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M2070 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX450 is a notebook card while Tesla M2070 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
NVIDIA Tesla M2070
Tesla M2070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1343 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate Tesla M2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX450 or Tesla M2070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.