Tesla M2070 vs GeForce MX450

Place in the ranking	460	636
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.11
Power efficiency	26.59	1.49
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	GF100
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 August 2020 (4 years ago)	25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$3,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	448
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	574 MHz
Boost clock speed	1575 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,700 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	100.8	32.14
Floating-point processing power	3.226 TFLOPS	1.03 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48
TMUs	64	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	248 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5, GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	783 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64.03 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2	N/A
CUDA	7.5	2.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	29 +107%	14−16 −107%
1440p	18 +100%	9−10 −100%
4K	30 +114%	14−16 −114%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	221.36
1440p	no data	344.33
4K	no data	221.36

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

32
+100%

16−18

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10 +100%	5−6 −100%
Battlefield 5	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	22 +120%	10−11 −120%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +120%	10−11 −120%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +125%	12−14 −125%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +113%	30−33 −113%
Hitman 3	30 +114%	14−16 −114%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +121%	24−27 −121%
Metro Exodus	55 +104%	27−30 −104%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45 +114%	21−24 −114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +100%	16−18 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	94 +109%	45−50 −109%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6 +100%	3−4 −100%
Battlefield 5	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	13 +117%	6−7 −117%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +120%	10−11 −120%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +125%	12−14 −125%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +113%	30−33 −113%
Hitman 3	29 +107%	14−16 −107%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +121%	24−27 −121%
Metro Exodus	37 +106%	18−20 −106%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +125%	12−14 −125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40 +122%	18−20 −122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +117%	12−14 −117%
Watch Dogs: Legion	89 +123%	40−45 −123%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	11 +120%	5−6 −120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	8 +100%	4−5 −100%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +120%	10−11 −120%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +113%	30−33 −113%
Hitman 3	25 +108%	12−14 −108%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24 +100%	12−14 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30 +114%	14−16 −114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 +100%	10−11 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7 +133%	3−4 −133%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

31
+121%

14−16

−121%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +114%	7−8 −114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7 +133%	3−4 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +100%	21−24 −100%
Hitman 3	18 +100%	9−10 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18 +100%	9−10 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +103%	30−33 −103%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

26
+117%

12−14

−117%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Hitman 3	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +128%	18−20 −128%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+125%

4−5

−125%

This is how GeForce MX450 and Tesla M2070 compete in popular games:

GeForce MX450 is 107% faster in 1080p
GeForce MX450 is 100% faster in 1440p
GeForce MX450 is 114% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.70	4.89
Recency	1 August 2020	25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	225 Watt

GeForce MX450 has a 98.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.

Tesla M2070, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce MX450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M2070 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX450 is a notebook card while Tesla M2070 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.