NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 5

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
 
Value for money (0-100)
no data
 
1.42
Architecture
Pascal
 
Vega
GPU code name
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
 
Vega
Market segment
Laptop
 
Laptop
Launch date
20 February 2020 (1 year ago)
 
7 January 2020 (1 year ago)
Price now
no data
 
$287

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
640
 
320
Core clock speed
1354 MHz
 
no data
Boost clock speed
1468 MHz
 
1400 MHz
Number of transistors
3,300 million
 
no data
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
 
7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
20 Watt
 
no data
Texture fill rate
29.98
 
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce MX350 and Radeon RX Vega 5 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
no data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
GDDR5
 
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
 
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
 
no data
Memory clock speed
7000 MHz
 
no data
Memory bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
 
no data
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
No outputs
 
no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus
+
 
-

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX
12 (12_1)
 
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
6.4
 
no data
OpenGL
4.6
 
no data
OpenCL
1.2
 
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
 
-
CUDA
6.1
 
-

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX350 10.90 +1.8%
RX Vega 5 10.71

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce MX350 24795 +35.6%
RX Vega 5 18282

3DMark Fire Strike Score

GeForce MX350 3985 +78.5%
RX Vega 5 2232

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce MX350 4369 +79.2%
RX Vega 5 2438

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce MX350 6159 +74.2%
RX Vega 5 3535

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce MX350 282988 +120%
RX Vega 5 128628

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Both graphics cards satisfy the 84% minimum and 72% recommended requirements of all games known to us.

Minimum
84%
Recommended
72%
Minimum
84%
Recommended
72%

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

 
GeForce MX350
RX Vega 5
1080p
 
29 +26.1%
23 −26.1%
1440p
 
19
no data
4K
 
24
no data

1920x1080
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey
 
22 +46.7%
 
15 −46.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
 
13
 
no data
Battlefield 5
 
37 +68.2%
 
22 −68.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare
 
32 +88.2%
 
17 −88.2%
Cyberpunk 2077
 
11
 
no data
Far Cry 5
 
27 +80%
 
15 −80%
Far Cry New Dawn
 
28
 
no data
Forza Horizon 4
 
37
 
no data
Hitman 3
 
22
 
no data
Horizon Zero Dawn
 
16
 
no data
Red Dead Redemption 2
 
18 +38.5%
 
13 −38.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
 
23 +64.3%
 
14 −64.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion
 
18
 
no data

1920x1080
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey
 
14 +16.7%
 
12 −16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
 
6
 
no data
Battlefield 5
 
30 +66.7%
 
18 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare
 
20
 
no data
Cyberpunk 2077
 
7
 
no data
Far Cry 5
 
22 +83.3%
 
12 −83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn
 
26
 
no data
Forza Horizon 4
 
26
 
no data
Hitman 3
 
18
 
no data
Horizon Zero Dawn
 
12
 
no data
Metro Exodus
 
12 +0%
 
12 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
 
15 +25%
 
12 −25%
Watch Dogs: Legion
 
14
 
no data

1920x1080
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey
 
8
 
no data
Battlefield 5
 
24 +50%
 
16 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077
 
6
 
no data
Far Cry 5
 
21
 
no data
Far Cry New Dawn
 
23
 
no data
Forza Horizon 4
 
19
 
no data
Watch Dogs: Legion
 
6
 
no data

Competitors of GeForce MX350 from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce MX350 from AMD is Radeon RX Vega 5, which is slower by 2% and lower by 6 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce MX350:

Competitors of Radeon RX Vega 5 from NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon RX Vega 5 from NVIDIA is GeForce GT 750M SLI, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 2 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX Vega 5:

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX350

1.8% better performance in benchmarks

Somewhat newer (20 February 2020 vs 7 January 2020)

More pipelines (640 vs 320)

Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 5

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 vs 14 nm)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 5. The differences in performance seem too small.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce MX350
AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Like
Like

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.