MX350 vs RTX 3090 Ti

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now no data
Games supported 67%
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1354
  • Max video memory 2 GB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 7000
  • Maximum resolution
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1560
  • Max video memory 24 GB
  • Memory type GDDR6X
  • Memory clock speed 21000
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 1433$
Games supported 100%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating4313
Place by popularity8018
Value for moneyno data13.33
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1Ampere GA102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date20 February 2020 (2 years ago)27 January 2022 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999
Current priceno data$1433 (0.7x MSRP)
Value for money

To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.

no data
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64010752
Core clock speed1354 MHz1560 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1860 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)25 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate29.98625.0

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce MX350 and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed7000 MHz21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth56.06 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.6

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX350 7.28
RTX 3090 Ti 76.04
+945%
  • Passmark
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

GeForce MX350 2845
RTX 3090 Ti 29703
+944%

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce MX350 6166
RTX 3090 Ti 69481
+1027%

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce MX350 24744
RTX 3090 Ti 246319
+895%

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce MX350 3985
RTX 3090 Ti 36563
+818%

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce MX350 4371
RTX 3090 Ti 53110
+1115%

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GeForce MX350 285166
RTX 3090 Ti 564087
+97.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD29
−628%
211
+628%
1440p27
−426%
142
+426%
4K25
−300%
100
+300%

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−3029%
219
+3029%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
−386%
100−110
+386%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
−1131%
160
+1131%
Battlefield 5 37
−349%
160−170
+349%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
−447%
170−180
+447%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−2771%
201
+2771%
Far Cry 5 27
−481%
150−160
+481%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
−350%
120−130
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−446%
200−210
+446%
Hitman 3 22
−859%
210−220
+859%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16
−938%
160−170
+938%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
−622%
130−140
+622%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
−1052%
265
+1052%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18
−850%
171
+850%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14
−664%
100−110
+664%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6
−2200%
138
+2200%
Battlefield 5 30
−453%
160−170
+453%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20
−775%
170−180
+775%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−2371%
173
+2371%
Far Cry 5 23
−583%
150−160
+583%
Far Cry New Dawn 26
−385%
120−130
+385%
Forza Horizon 4 26
−677%
200−210
+677%
Hitman 3 18
−1072%
210−220
+1072%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
−1283%
160−170
+1283%
Metro Exodus 12
−1383%
178
+1383%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15
−1573%
251
+1573%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
−1359%
394
+1359%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
−1000%
154
+1000%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
−1238%
100−110
+1238%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−1950%
123
+1950%
Battlefield 5 24
−592%
160−170
+592%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−2071%
152
+2071%
Far Cry 5 21
−648%
150−160
+648%
Far Cry New Dawn 23
−448%
120−130
+448%
Forza Horizon 4 19
−963%
200−210
+963%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−1106%
193
+1106%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6
−2067%
130
+2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−1164%
130−140
+1164%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1822%
170−180
+1822%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−1311%
120−130
+1311%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1983%
125
+1983%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1200%
75−80
+1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1944%
184
+1944%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1520%
80−85
+1520%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−5300%
108
+5300%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−1725%
140−150
+1725%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−10300%
104
+10300%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1638%
130−140
+1638%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1313%
110−120
+1313%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1375%
170−180
+1375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−2600%
108
+2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1660%
85−90
+1660%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1386%
100−110
+1386%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−1200%
75−80
+1200%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−4100%
84
+4100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−940%
50−55
+940%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−3433%
106
+3433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2371%
173
+2371%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1867%
55−60
+1867%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−3550%
73
+3550%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−2500%
100−110
+2500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5200%
53
+5200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1433%
90−95
+1433%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1400%
130−140
+1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−2233%
70
+2233%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 7.28 76.04
Recency 20 February 2020 27 January 2022
Memory bus width 64 384
Memory bandwidth 56.06 1
Pipelines / CUDA cores 640 10752
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 25 Watt 450 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

since it shows better performance.

Be aware that GeForce MX350 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of GeForce MX350 by AMD

The nearest GeForce MX350's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX Vega 5, which is faster by 1% and higher by 3 positions in our performance rating.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 Radeon RX Vega 5
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce MX350:

Competitors of GeForce RTX 3090 Ti by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 3090 Ti from AMD is Radeon RX 6950 XT, which is slower by 4% and lower by 1 position in our rating.

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT Radeon RX 6950 XT
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3090 Ti:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 905 ratings

Rate NVIDIA GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1842 ratings

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.