GeForce MX570 vs MX250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A

Aggregate performance score

GeForce MX250
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 10 Watt
6.27

MX570 outperforms MX250 by a whopping 137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking546332
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.36no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN17S-G2GN20-S5
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date20 February 2019 (5 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price$1165 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed1518 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10/25 Watt15-45 Watt
Texture fill rate24.9173.92

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce MX250 and GeForce MX570 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7000 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA6.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX250 6.27
GeForce MX570 14.87
+137%

MX570 outperforms MX250 by 137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce MX250 2423
GeForce MX570 5749
+137%

MX570 outperforms MX250 by 137% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−117%
50−55
+117%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14
−64.3%
21−24
+64.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
−63.2%
30−35
+63.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Battlefield 5 21
−129%
45−50
+129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
−77.8%
30−35
+77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−109%
21−24
+109%
Far Cry 5 22
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
−55.6%
40−45
+55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 31
−61.3%
50−55
+61.3%
Hitman 3 14−16
−143%
30−35
+143%
Horizon Zero Dawn 37
−29.7%
45−50
+29.7%
Metro Exodus 25
−80%
45−50
+80%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
−50%
40−45
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 29
−41.4%
40−45
+41.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
−138%
30−35
+138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Battlefield 5 17
−182%
45−50
+182%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
−77.8%
30−35
+77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−130%
21−24
+130%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 17
−147%
40−45
+147%
Forza Horizon 4 24
−108%
50−55
+108%
Hitman 3 8
−325%
30−35
+325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 26
−84.6%
45−50
+84.6%
Metro Exodus 18
−150%
45−50
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21
−100%
40−45
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15
−173%
40−45
+173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
−47.6%
30−35
+47.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−343%
30−35
+343%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12
−167%
30−35
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−130%
21−24
+130%
Far Cry 5 13
−208%
40−45
+208%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−213%
50−55
+213%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Metro Exodus 17
−165%
45−50
+165%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−158%
30−35
+158%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18
−133%
40−45
+133%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−142%
27−30
+142%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Hitman 3 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−155%
27−30
+155%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 16−18
−100%
30−35
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%
Hitman 3 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%

This is how GeForce MX250 and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is 117% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 1250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 70 tests (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.27 14.87
Recency 20 February 2019 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX250 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GeForce MX250
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1482 votes

Rate GeForce MX250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 70 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.