UHD Graphics 750 vs GeForce MX230

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX230 with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX230
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 10 Watt
4.10
+5.7%

MX230 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking660677
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency32.5420.53
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGP108Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date21 February 2019 (6 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256256
Core clock speed1519 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate25.3120.80
Floating-point processing power0.81 TFLOPS0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX230 4.10
+5.7%
UHD Graphics 750 3.88

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX230 1831
+5.7%
UHD Graphics 750 1733

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Battlefield 5 20
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 15
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
Fortnite 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21
+5%
20−22
−5%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Valorant 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Battlefield 5 16
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65
−13.8%
70−75
+13.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 58
+16%
50−55
−16%
Far Cry 5 13
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Fortnite 20
−20%
24−27
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−25%
20−22
+25%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Grand Theft Auto V 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Metro Exodus 4
−100%
8−9
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+25%
12−14
−25%
Valorant 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Far Cry 5 12
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−66.7%
20−22
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Valorant 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16
−50%
24−27
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+6.3%
30−35
−6.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Valorant 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GeForce MX230 and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX230 is 17% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX230 is 50% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX230 is ahead in 32 tests (58%)
  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 9 tests (16%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.10 3.88
Recency 21 February 2019 30 March 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce MX230 has a 5.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce MX230 and UHD Graphics 750.

Be aware that GeForce MX230 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GeForce MX230
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1424 votes

Rate GeForce MX230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 409 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX230 or UHD Graphics 750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.