NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs GTX 675M
Comparison of GeForce MX150 and GeForce GTX 675M architecture, market type and release date.
GeForce MX150 and GeForce GTX 675M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce MX150 and GeForce GTX 675M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
46.98 GTexel / s
39.7 billion / sec
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce MX150 and GeForce GTX 675M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCI Express 2.0
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce MX150 and GeForce GTX 675M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
48.06 GB / s
96.0 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce MX150 and GeForce GTX 675M.
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce MX150 and GeForce GTX 675M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
APIs supported by GeForce MX150 and GeForce GTX 675M, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of GeForce MX150 and GeForce GTX 675M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
GeForce MX150 4.42 +7%
GTX 675M 4.13
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
GeForce MX150 19132 +6%
GTX 675M 18056
3DMark Fire Strike Score
GeForce MX150 3104 +42.3%
GTX 675M 2182
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
GeForce MX150 3488 +49.6%
GTX 675M 2331
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
GeForce MX150 4494 +39.7%
GTX 675M 3218
3DMark Vantage Performance
GeForce MX150 10992
GTX 675M 14756 +34.2%
Unigine Heaven 3.0
GeForce MX150 42 +20%
GTX 675M 35
GeForce MX150 2222 +3.4%
GTX 675M 2149
Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce MX150 and GeForce GTX 675M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good GeForce MX150 and GeForce GTX 675M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX150
7% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (16 May 2017 vs 22 March 2012)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 40 nm)
Less power hungry (25 vs 100 watts)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
Wider memory bus (256 vs 64 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (96 vs 48.06 GB/s)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
SLI (Scalable Link Interface - a technology for uniting several NVIDIA GPUs processing power in one PC)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
3D Vision Surround
So, MX150 or GTX 675M?
Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between GeForce MX150 and GeForce GTX 675M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.