Radeon 620 vs GeForce MX130

Place in the ranking	646	845
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	10.92	3.28
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	GM108	Polaris 24
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	17 November 2017 (7 years ago)	13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	384
Core clock speed	1122 MHz	730 MHz
Boost clock speed	1242 MHz	1024 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	29.81	24.58
Floating-point processing power	0.9539 TFLOPS	0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX130 4.75
+99.6%

Radeon 620 2.38

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX130 1828
+99.3%

Radeon 620 917

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce MX130 2345
+35.5%

Radeon 620 1730

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

17
+113%

8−9

−113%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	4 −25%	5−6 +25%
Elden Ring	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	22 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Valorant	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Counter-Strike 2	3 −233%	10−11 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Dota 2	21 +320%	5−6 −320%
Elden Ring	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Far Cry 5	26 +85.7%	14−16 −85.7%
Fortnite	24 +100%	12−14 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	16 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	15 +150%	6−7 −150%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35 +59.1%	21−24 −59.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 +40%	10−11 −40%
Valorant	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
World of Tanks	75−80 +77.3%	40−45 −77.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Dota 2	28 +460%	5−6 −460%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
Forza Horizon 4	14 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10 −120%	21−24 +120%
Valorant	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Elden Ring	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +100%	16−18 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
World of Tanks	30−35 +113%	16−18 −113%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Valorant	12−14 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Elden Ring	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Dota 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Fortnite	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Valorant	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%

This is how GeForce MX130 and Radeon 620 compete in popular games:

GeForce MX130 is 113% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX130 is 600% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 620 is 233% faster.

All in all, in popular games: