Radeon 625 vs GeForce MX110

Place in performance ranking	667	759
Place by popularity	96	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.91	0.45
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	N16V-GMR1	Polaris 24
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 January 2018 (6 years ago)	12 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$1057	$68

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GeForce MX110 has 102% better value for money than Radeon 625.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	384
Core clock speed	965 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	993 MHz	1024 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	23.83	24.58
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce MX110 and Radeon 625 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX110 3.73
+34.2%

Radeon 625 2.78

GeForce MX110 outperforms Radeon 625 by 34% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce MX110 1444
+34.1%

Radeon 625 1077

GeForce MX110 outperforms Radeon 625 by 34% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

18
+50%

12−14

−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8
+40%

5−6

−40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9 +125%	4−5 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Battlefield 5	14 +133%	6−7 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10 −20%	12−14 +20%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry 5	10 +150%	4−5 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	10 +150%	4−5 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	16 +129%	7−8 −129%
Hitman 3	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7 +75%	4−5 −75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Battlefield 5	12 +100%	6−7 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry 5	9 +125%	4−5 −125%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Forza Horizon 4	12 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Hitman 3	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Metro Exodus	2 −100%	4−5 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Battlefield 5	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry 5	8 +100%	4−5 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 −40%	7−8 +40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Hitman 3	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Hitman 3	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1

This is how GeForce MX110 and Radeon 625 compete in popular games:

GeForce MX110 is 50% faster than Radeon 625 in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX110 is 200% faster than the Radeon 625.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 625 is 100% faster than the GeForce MX110.

All in all, in popular games: